Talk:Office Space
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(formatting question) |
(would you believe... occurrences?) |
||
| (includes 8 intermediate revisions) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
I know '''Appearances''' is the standard for these articles, but wouldn't '''Occurances''' be more applicable? {{User:Invisible_Robot_Fish/sig}} 22:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC) | I know '''Appearances''' is the standard for these articles, but wouldn't '''Occurances''' be more applicable? {{User:Invisible_Robot_Fish/sig}} 22:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Yes, I think we had a similar occurance of that problem in another article the other week, and we decided to go with "occurance" rather than "appearance".{{User:Loafing/sig}} 23:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Sorry Bout that, this was my first time making an article. I'll try to do better next time - The who created that page, {{User:HeyMama/sig}} | ||
| + | :::Whatcha talking about, HeyMama? Excellent work, there! This is the normal process of new articles; most new ones are changed quite dramatically in the first few days. Keep up the good work.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 00:55, 5 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::Yeah, good work HeyMama—I for one hadn't noticed that there were ''any'' references to ''Office Space'' until you started this article :) {{User:Trey56/sig}} 00:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Thanx you guys. I figured since it was such a great movie, why not make it an Article? Plus I love and own that movie."Yeah, that'd be greeeeeeat." - I'm gonna go ahead and ask you to sign your name here, thannnnnnks {{User:HeyMama/sig}} | ||
| + | ::Yeah, agreed. Good article, it is greeeeeeat. --{{User:Theyellowdart/sig}} | ||
| + | ::Thanks, guys - {{User:HeyMama/sig}} | ||
| + | I too agree that '''Occurrences''' (the correct spelling) is more apt in these situations. It already appears as a heading on [[What are you supposed to be?]] and [[References To Icons (Halloween Costumes)]]. Let's establish some sort of consensus on that thought, pro or con. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 03:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
Current revision as of 03:30, 12 April 2007
I know Appearances is the standard for these articles, but wouldn't Occurances be more applicable? 
I R F 22:43, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, I think we had a similar occurance of that problem in another article the other week, and we decided to go with "occurance" rather than "appearance". Loafing
23:31, 4 January 2007 (UTC)
- Sorry Bout that, this was my first time making an article. I'll try to do better next time - The who created that page,
Wario64
- Whatcha talking about, HeyMama? Excellent work, there! This is the normal process of new articles; most new ones are changed quite dramatically in the first few days. Keep up the good work. Loafing 00:55, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, good work HeyMama—I for one hadn't noticed that there were any references to Office Space until you started this article :)
Trey56 00:59, 5 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, good work HeyMama—I for one hadn't noticed that there were any references to Office Space until you started this article :)
- Whatcha talking about, HeyMama? Excellent work, there! This is the normal process of new articles; most new ones are changed quite dramatically in the first few days. Keep up the good work. Loafing
- Sorry Bout that, this was my first time making an article. I'll try to do better next time - The who created that page,
- Thanx you guys. I figured since it was such a great movie, why not make it an Article? Plus I love and own that movie."Yeah, that'd be greeeeeeat." - I'm gonna go ahead and ask you to sign your name here, thannnnnnks Wario64
- Yeah, agreed. Good article, it is greeeeeeat. --TheYellowDart—(t/c)
- Thanks, guys - Wario64
I too agree that Occurrences (the correct spelling) is more apt in these situations. It already appears as a heading on What are you supposed to be? and References To Icons (Halloween Costumes). Let's establish some sort of consensus on that thought, pro or con. - Qermaq - (T/C) 
03:27, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
