Talk:Someteen

(Difference between revisions)

Revision as of 18:17, 3 June 2007

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

We have only two occurrences for this, and they can easily be covered in portmanteaus. Loafing 21:08, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

I agree with Loafing. --TheYellowDart—(t/c) 21:13, 23 April 2007 (UTC) ooh! Fancy new template!

Agree. --

21:15, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Looks to me like a maybe-someday-but-not-yet. Heimstern Läufer

21:27, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

This seems more like a dictionary entry than a page. Belongs in Glossary and/or Portmanteaus. — Has Matt? (talk) 21:33, 23 April 2007 (UTC)

Covered in mentioned pages. Redirect to Portmanteaus or Glossary#S. — Elcool ^(talk)_(contribs) 06:16, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

I agree with everything that Has Matt? said. – T he C hort 17:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

I wouldn't quite call it a portmanteau, so I'd say it goes under the Glossary.· · T ²|_Things 18:17, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

@@ Line 9: / Line 9: @@
 :::::Covered in mentioned pages. Redirect to [[Portmanteaus]] or [[Glossary#S]]. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 06:16, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
 ::::::I agree with everything that Has Matt? said. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 17:47, 7 May 2007 (UTC)
+:::::::I wouldn't quite call it a portmanteau, so I'd say it goes under the Glossary.{{User:Ten Ten/sig}} 18:17, 3 June 2007 (UTC)