Talk:Strong Bad Email Outros
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Bad Bad Guy (Talk | contribs) (→Outro?) |
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (→Outro?: problem? we don't need no steenking problem?) |
||
| Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
::::::::::I don't think these are "sendoffs" (which is one word, by the way)... I think they're "sign-offs". — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 17:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC) | ::::::::::I don't think these are "sendoffs" (which is one word, by the way)... I think they're "sign-offs". — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 17:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
:::::::::::I'm sorry, but that doesn't solve the spin-off problem because it still begins with "s" and ends in "off." [[User:Bad Bad Guy|Bad Bad Guy]] 23:36, 7 June 2007 (UTC) | :::::::::::I'm sorry, but that doesn't solve the spin-off problem because it still begins with "s" and ends in "off." [[User:Bad Bad Guy|Bad Bad Guy]] 23:36, 7 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::::::::::What problem? Because the look and sound similar? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 23:37, 7 June 2007 (UTC) | ||
== Animal == | == Animal == | ||
How long should that outro be? [[User:Bad Bad Guy|Bad Bad Guy]] 20:23, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | How long should that outro be? [[User:Bad Bad Guy|Bad Bad Guy]] 20:23, 7 April 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:37, 7 June 2007
Contents |
Limits?
Is there any outro we can't add to this page? I find the ones from 2 years, lady fan, alternate universe, theme song, cliffhangers, and retirement would be questionable for some reason. Bad Bad Guy 00:50, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
Move along, move along
How many of you would say this is ready to go from "section stub" to "incomplete list?" I'm going for a consencus-type discussion here. Bad Bad Guy 01:10, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- Wait... why is this an incomplete list? Isn't everything in the list that can be? — It's dot com 17:56, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Some of them aren't on there yet. (4 for example) — Defender1031*Talk 17:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- No, homestar hair isn't on there because there isn't a sign-off. ... unless "Forget you guys" counts. — It's dot com 17:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- and 9-12? and 17-19? 22? 25-26? need i go on? — Defender1031*Talk 18:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Um, yes, I think you do. In every one of those examples (except 19, which is already in the list), Strong Bad doesn't address the viewer at the end. — It's dot com 18:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Then I guess you're right. — Defender1031*Talk 18:28, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Um, yes, I think you do. In every one of those examples (except 19, which is already in the list), Strong Bad doesn't address the viewer at the end. — It's dot com 18:25, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- and 9-12? and 17-19? 22? 25-26? need i go on? — Defender1031*Talk 18:02, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- No, homestar hair isn't on there because there isn't a sign-off. ... unless "Forget you guys" counts. — It's dot com 17:59, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Some of them aren't on there yet. (4 for example) — Defender1031*Talk 17:57, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Outro?
The name sounds terribly slang-like. Isn't there a more objective term? - Joshua 01:19, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- "Closings?" "Farewells?" "Send-offs?" That's the best I can come up with for now. Anything to say about my other two messages? Bad Bad Guy 02:02, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Bad Email Send-offs is the 1 I like best out of those 3. Bad Bad Guy 18:47, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- I never did like the word "outro"... --DorianGray 19:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- "Foam" isn't a very good word either. Blegh. Anyway, I like Strong Bad Email Send-offs myself. -Brightstar Shiner 19:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- The reason I didn't move it is because it might imply a relation to Strong Bad Email Spin-offs. Bad Bad Guy 00:37, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- If Strong Bad Email Send-offs is really the best we can come up with, someone needs to assure me it won't imply a nonexistent relation to the spin-off thing. Bad Bad Guy 20:12, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- I like Strong Bad Email Closing Statements. — Defender1031*Talk 20:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- Sounds too broad for me. Like we'd also include some where he does nothing special. Bad Bad Guy 17:14, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- How about Strong Bad Email Closing Endings then? — Defender1031*Talk 17:17, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- I don't think these are "sendoffs" (which is one word, by the way)... I think they're "sign-offs". — It's dot com 17:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but that doesn't solve the spin-off problem because it still begins with "s" and ends in "off." Bad Bad Guy 23:36, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- What problem? Because the look and sound similar? — Defender1031*Talk 23:37, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- I'm sorry, but that doesn't solve the spin-off problem because it still begins with "s" and ends in "off." Bad Bad Guy 23:36, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
- I don't think these are "sendoffs" (which is one word, by the way)... I think they're "sign-offs". — It's dot com 17:53, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- How about Strong Bad Email Closing Endings then? — Defender1031*Talk 17:17, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- Sounds too broad for me. Like we'd also include some where he does nothing special. Bad Bad Guy 17:14, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
- I like Strong Bad Email Closing Statements. — Defender1031*Talk 20:14, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- If Strong Bad Email Send-offs is really the best we can come up with, someone needs to assure me it won't imply a nonexistent relation to the spin-off thing. Bad Bad Guy 20:12, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
- The reason I didn't move it is because it might imply a relation to Strong Bad Email Spin-offs. Bad Bad Guy 00:37, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
- "Foam" isn't a very good word either. Blegh. Anyway, I like Strong Bad Email Send-offs myself. -Brightstar Shiner 19:22, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- I never did like the word "outro"... --DorianGray 19:11, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
- Strong Bad Email Send-offs is the 1 I like best out of those 3. Bad Bad Guy 18:47, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
Animal
How long should that outro be? Bad Bad Guy 20:23, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
