Talk:Wetski
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
DorianGray (Talk | contribs) (→Notable yet?: We have a dozen just like it.) |
(→Notable yet?) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Looking over the [[HRWiki:Inclusion guidelines]], an item needs to appear more than once to have its own page, unless it is key to the plot of the toon. To my eye, it would seem that the Wetski is a marginal piece just yet. Sure, Bubs held it up during [[Ever And More!]], but is that sole appearance to date warrant a page? {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 04:30, 15 July 2007 (UTC) | Looking over the [[HRWiki:Inclusion guidelines]], an item needs to appear more than once to have its own page, unless it is key to the plot of the toon. To my eye, it would seem that the Wetski is a marginal piece just yet. Sure, Bubs held it up during [[Ever And More!]], but is that sole appearance to date warrant a page? {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 04:30, 15 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
:I think we have a ton of pages of such items. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 04:32, 15 July 2007 (UTC) | :I think we have a ton of pages of such items. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 04:32, 15 July 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | I think it is pretty important because it was one of the "shiny new ways to misappropriate funds." Maybe if it was a background item it would not be a marginal piece.[[User:SantanaHomerunner|SantanaHomerunner/]] | ||
Revision as of 04:39, 15 July 2007
Better Picture
Someone do us all a favor and upload a new picture if this one doesn't look good. 
Homestarmy Commando1
Notable yet?
Looking over the HRWiki:Inclusion guidelines, an item needs to appear more than once to have its own page, unless it is key to the plot of the toon. To my eye, it would seem that the Wetski is a marginal piece just yet. Sure, Bubs held it up during Ever And More!, but is that sole appearance to date warrant a page? wbwolf (t | ed) 04:30, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
- I think we have a ton of pages of such items. --DorianGray 04:32, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
I think it is pretty important because it was one of the "shiny new ways to misappropriate funds." Maybe if it was a background item it would not be a marginal piece.SantanaHomerunner/
