Talk:Datum Center Computers
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(reply) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:Maybe then you shouldn't stir up thoughts of deletion on it, then...? --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 20:19, 19 February 2007 (UTC) | :Maybe then you shouldn't stir up thoughts of deletion on it, then...? --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 20:19, 19 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
::Maybe I shouldn't, but I was really just trying to discourage anybody from deleting this thing. It's a good article and deserves to stay. -{{User:Brightstar Shiner/sig}} 22:40, 20 February 2007 (UTC) | ::Maybe I shouldn't, but I was really just trying to discourage anybody from deleting this thing. It's a good article and deserves to stay. -{{User:Brightstar Shiner/sig}} 22:40, 20 February 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Not to be an idiot... == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I don't get this article. I just don't understand it's purpose. Is the "Computers" after "Datum Center" really necessary. I think that the computers should not be referred to as part of the datum center. I guess that's the only thing throwing me off. Other than that I think it's fine. <sub>...but it might not meet HRWiki standards...</sub> {{User:SantanaHomerunner/sig}} 22:59, 20 October 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 22:59, 20 October 2007
I like this article. Before anybody says anything bad about it or proposes it for deletion, I just wanted to say that. Thank you for your time. -Brightstar Shiner 20:15, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe then you shouldn't stir up thoughts of deletion on it, then...? --DorianGray 20:19, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
- Maybe I shouldn't, but I was really just trying to discourage anybody from deleting this thing. It's a good article and deserves to stay. -Brightstar Shiner 22:40, 20 February 2007 (UTC)
Not to be an idiot...
I don't get this article. I just don't understand it's purpose. Is the "Computers" after "Datum Center" really necessary. I think that the computers should not be referred to as part of the datum center. I guess that's the only thing throwing me off. Other than that I think it's fine. ...but it might not meet HRWiki standards... Super!SantanaDuper! 22:59, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
