Talk:Babies

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(→delete?: replky)
(→delete?: Reply to DeFender)
Line 5: Line 5:
Please specify why this is a spoon. [[user:haldo]][[User:Haldo|Haldo]] 00:51, 7 November 2007 (UTC) It's not a spoon, It's neither obscurly uncomon nor rediculously common.
Please specify why this is a spoon. [[user:haldo]][[User:Haldo|Haldo]] 00:51, 7 November 2007 (UTC) It's not a spoon, It's neither obscurly uncomon nor rediculously common.
:Babies are very common. (sorry for the late reply, i didn't notice you had edit conflicted me) {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
:Babies are very common. (sorry for the late reply, i didn't notice you had edit conflicted me) {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 01:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
 +
::I think you're misunderstanding the message of the Spoons page, DeFender. Just because an object is common in the real world does not mean it can't have an article. If it is used in situations beyond what would be considered normal in real life (things like "my baby got stole", "wave o' babies", or "babies having babies"), than it may be deserving of a page. Right now I'm neutral on this article, though. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 01:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:10, 7 November 2007

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 

delete?

HRWiki:spoons and yes it is. — Defender1031*Talk 00:47, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Please specify why this is a spoon. user:haldoHaldo 00:51, 7 November 2007 (UTC) It's not a spoon, It's neither obscurly uncomon nor rediculously common.

Babies are very common. (sorry for the late reply, i didn't notice you had edit conflicted me) — Defender1031*Talk 01:04, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
I think you're misunderstanding the message of the Spoons page, DeFender. Just because an object is common in the real world does not mean it can't have an article. If it is used in situations beyond what would be considered normal in real life (things like "my baby got stole", "wave o' babies", or "babies having babies"), than it may be deserving of a page. Right now I'm neutral on this article, though. — Has Matt? (talk) 01:10, 7 November 2007 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Babies"
Personal tools