HRWiki:Featured Article Selection/Discussion Archive 2008 Weeks 11-20
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(archived week 11 (mostly so it doesn't appear as a red link of the FAS page)) |
MHarrington (Talk | contribs) (Added "week 12") |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
::As someone who rarely makes the first post, I know Heimi's approach would be helpful to me in determining what consensus is or could be for any particular week. Having one main article to start would help in knowing what we are doing. That said, what is, indeed, on the table for this week? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 05:22, 3 March 2008 (UTC) | ::As someone who rarely makes the first post, I know Heimi's approach would be helpful to me in determining what consensus is or could be for any particular week. Having one main article to start would help in knowing what we are doing. That said, what is, indeed, on the table for this week? {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 05:22, 3 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
:::Lappynapped! has been on the table for quite a bit: even before it was suggested, we had discussions elsewhere about featuring something from the Lappynapping saga, and, as Wbwolf suggests, this has also been discussed on the discussion page for this project page. Of course, this doesn't mean we have to feature it, but I would suggest that we should unless there is a clear reason to go a different direction. Hope that answers your question. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 05:32, 3 March 2008 (UTC) | :::Lappynapped! has been on the table for quite a bit: even before it was suggested, we had discussions elsewhere about featuring something from the Lappynapping saga, and, as Wbwolf suggests, this has also been discussed on the discussion page for this project page. Of course, this doesn't mean we have to feature it, but I would suggest that we should unless there is a clear reason to go a different direction. Hope that answers your question. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 05:32, 3 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ===[[HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 12]] (Mar 17-23)=== | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[Astro-Lite 2600]]. [[User:124.181.65.132|124.181.65.132]] 09:12, 16 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | :For an entire week? I don't think it's nearly significant enough for that. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 17:16, 16 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::How about [[Where's The Cheat?]] It was the longest running toon for 5 years. {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 17:19, 16 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::Wait, this is Easter week (Easter is on the 23). So why not [[Eggs (toon)]]? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 23:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::I don't really think [[Eggs (toon)]] has sufficient content for an FA. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 06:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::::How about [[Tiny-Handed Strong Bad]]? [[User:MHarrington|MHarrington]] 02:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::::[[Tiny-Handed Strong Bad]] is awesome! Let's feature him! {{User:Homestar-winner/sig}} 01:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::::::Tiny Hands is my choice. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 05:26, 3 March 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 15:37, 17 March 2008
This is an archive. Please do not add discussion here. Voice your opinion on upcoming featured articles on this page.
HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 11 (Mar 10-16)
Per the discussion page, how about Lappynapped!? wbwolf (t | ed) 03:45, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
- All right, sounds like a fine idea. Note that this won't prevent us from also featuring retirement and/or cliffhangers someday should we choose to. Heimstern Läufer
17:20, 11 February 2008 (UTC)
Let me put in a different idea Bad Graphics Ghost why have we not done this one. 
The-homsarrunner
Mar 2 2008
- We've kind of been discussing doing something relating to the Lappynapping saga for quite a while, and I don't see any reason to deviate from that plan.
- As a more general note, could I ask everyone who contributes to this page to consider this: If an idea has already been suggested for a particular week, I think it's poor etiquette to suggest featuring a different article without explaining why it would be a better choice. It's kind of dismissing someone else's idea without a reason. I'm not suggesting that we should always feature whatever article is suggested first, but that we should remember always explain why another article would be better rather than just sticking our suggestion in conflict with the original. Heimstern Läufer 01:52, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- As someone who rarely makes the first post, I know Heimi's approach would be helpful to me in determining what consensus is or could be for any particular week. Having one main article to start would help in knowing what we are doing. That said, what is, indeed, on the table for this week? - Qermaq - (T/C)
05:22, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Lappynapped! has been on the table for quite a bit: even before it was suggested, we had discussions elsewhere about featuring something from the Lappynapping saga, and, as Wbwolf suggests, this has also been discussed on the discussion page for this project page. Of course, this doesn't mean we have to feature it, but I would suggest that we should unless there is a clear reason to go a different direction. Hope that answers your question. Heimstern Läufer 05:32, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
- Lappynapped! has been on the table for quite a bit: even before it was suggested, we had discussions elsewhere about featuring something from the Lappynapping saga, and, as Wbwolf suggests, this has also been discussed on the discussion page for this project page. Of course, this doesn't mean we have to feature it, but I would suggest that we should unless there is a clear reason to go a different direction. Hope that answers your question. Heimstern Läufer
- As someone who rarely makes the first post, I know Heimi's approach would be helpful to me in determining what consensus is or could be for any particular week. Having one main article to start would help in knowing what we are doing. That said, what is, indeed, on the table for this week? - Qermaq - (T/C)
HRWiki:Featured article for 2008, week 12 (Mar 17-23)
Astro-Lite 2600. 124.181.65.132 09:12, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
- For an entire week? I don't think it's nearly significant enough for that. Heimstern Läufer 17:16, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
- How about Where's The Cheat? It was the longest running toon for 5 years.
Sam the Man 
17:19, 16 February 2008 (UTC)
- Wait, this is Easter week (Easter is on the 23). So why not Eggs (toon)? Sam the Man 23:53, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
- I don't really think Eggs (toon) has sufficient content for an FA. Heimstern Läufer 06:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- How about Tiny-Handed Strong Bad? MHarrington 02:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- Tiny-Handed Strong Bad is awesome! Let's feature him! Homestar-Winner (talk) 01:50, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- How about Tiny-Handed Strong Bad? MHarrington 02:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)
- I don't really think Eggs (toon) has sufficient content for an FA. Heimstern Läufer
- Wait, this is Easter week (Easter is on the 23). So why not Eggs (toon)?
- How about Where's The Cheat? It was the longest running toon for 5 years.
