Talk:Kewpie Dan

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(...let's put templates where they belong.)
m (→Delete Redux: Minor addendum.)
Line 13: Line 13:
== Delete Redux ==
== Delete Redux ==
-
Hm. Taking a look at this page, it doesn't really seem that useful. It's "long-standing", and while I *do* realize [[Talk:Jerome|the trouble TBD'ing these kinds of articles tend to cause]], in the end, it's basically a page dedicated to an obscure, mysterious character in a broken Easter egg. Yeah, it was perfectly acceptable in the days of the old Wiki, but it *does* seem quite unnecessary by today's revised standards; I've seen more informative articles unanimously deleted. We know next to nothing about this "character", and just about all we *do* know can be easily be mentioned in [[Dan]] and [[The House That Gave Sucky Treats]], respectively. I'd say, '''redirect''' it, probably to [[Dan]]. I get the feeling like this idea will meet with opposition from [[User:Trey56|the]] [[User:Heimstern Läufer|usual]] [[User:It's dot com|suspects]], but it's pretty much high time this article got some serious discussion. There've been two "Delete?" threads here over the last few years, but no actual discussion has ever taken place. -{{User:YK/sig}} 04:22, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
+
Hm. Taking a look at this page, it doesn't really seem that useful. It's "long-standing", and while I *do* realize [[Talk:Jerome|the trouble TBD'ing these kinds of articles tend to cause]], in the end, it's basically a page dedicated to an obscure, mysterious character in a broken Easter egg with no actual role in the toon. Yeah, it was perfectly acceptable in the days of the old Wiki, but it *does* seem quite unnecessary by today's revised standards; I've seen more informative articles unanimously deleted. We know next to nothing about this "character", and just about all we *do* know can be easily be mentioned in [[Dan]] and [[The House That Gave Sucky Treats]], respectively. I'd say, '''redirect''' it, probably to [[Dan]]. I get the feeling like this idea will meet with opposition from [[User:Trey56|the]] [[User:Heimstern Läufer|usual]] [[User:It's dot com|suspects]], but it's pretty much high time this article got some serious discussion. There've been two "Delete?" threads here over the last few years, but no actual discussion has ever taken place. -{{User:YK/sig}} 04:22, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 04:24, 9 June 2008

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 

Should this be in Rejects? He has only ever been mentioned once! -- Asploder

Because no one outside TBC really understand this character, or know the story behind "Get Fushling", it would make it an inside joke between the brothers. - Dr Haggis - Talk 19:22, 28 Dec 2004 (MST)

BALEET

Should this article even be here? Kewpie was never seen again, so he doesn't need his own article.

Kewpie Dan's origins revealed?! Probably not.

Okay, listen to this: today, I learned that the French word for "Cupid" is cupidon. This is pronounced koo-pee dahn, with the "ah" in "dahn" pronounced like in "da," the Russian word for yes. This is a stretch, but when I heard it, it was the first thing I thought of. It'd be better if it was a Valentine's toon he's from, but y'know...-LordQuackingstick 21:35, 16 February 2007 (UTC)

Delete Redux

Hm. Taking a look at this page, it doesn't really seem that useful. It's "long-standing", and while I *do* realize the trouble TBD'ing these kinds of articles tend to cause, in the end, it's basically a page dedicated to an obscure, mysterious character in a broken Easter egg with no actual role in the toon. Yeah, it was perfectly acceptable in the days of the old Wiki, but it *does* seem quite unnecessary by today's revised standards; I've seen more informative articles unanimously deleted. We know next to nothing about this "character", and just about all we *do* know can be easily be mentioned in Dan and The House That Gave Sucky Treats, respectively. I'd say, redirect it, probably to Dan. I get the feeling like this idea will meet with opposition from the usual suspects, but it's pretty much high time this article got some serious discussion. There've been two "Delete?" threads here over the last few years, but no actual discussion has ever taken place. -YKHi. I'm Ayjo! 04:22, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Kewpie_Dan"
Personal tools