Talk:X it out
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (rv, cussing and personal attack.) |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:::Those are neither very salient, nor even coherent points. Can either of you provide a logical reason why it should be separate, when the verbal formulation is so similar? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:23, 9 April 2012 (UTC) | :::Those are neither very salient, nor even coherent points. Can either of you provide a logical reason why it should be separate, when the verbal formulation is so similar? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:23, 9 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
The idea behind this page is distinct from [[X 'em up]] (the construction and context is different), but I don't think it's strong enough to support its own page. This page should be '''deleted.''' — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 18:37, 9 April 2012 (UTC) | The idea behind this page is distinct from [[X 'em up]] (the construction and context is different), but I don't think it's strong enough to support its own page. This page should be '''deleted.''' — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 18:37, 9 April 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | :Yes, I say '''delete''', too. |
Revision as of 08:32, 27 June 2012
Merge?
It's been pointed out to me that the page X 'em up already exists. Should this really be separate from that? — Defender1031*Talk 18:14, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- I think yes.
Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 18:17, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hecks yeah! X 'em up is no where close to this no matter wht you say! SaintOlaf 18:19, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- Those are neither very salient, nor even coherent points. Can either of you provide a logical reason why it should be separate, when the verbal formulation is so similar? — Defender1031*Talk 18:23, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- Hecks yeah! X 'em up is no where close to this no matter wht you say! SaintOlaf 18:19, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
The idea behind this page is distinct from X 'em up (the construction and context is different), but I don't think it's strong enough to support its own page. This page should be deleted. — It's dot com 18:37, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
- Yes, I say delete, too.