Talk:Humidibot
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (→Jumping the gun: reply) |
MichaelXX2 (Talk | contribs) (smooth) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
- | |||
== Jumping the gun == | == Jumping the gun == | ||
He's only appeared once, as a one-off joke. In addition, when the idea of giving him his own page was [[Talk:Fan Costumes 2015#ENTER HUMIDIBOT!|discussed]], that seemed to be the consensus. Then all of a sudden, a somewhat rude anonny shows up and {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fan_Costumes_2015&diff=next&oldid=753461 demands}} a page, and we suddenly create a {{p|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Humidibot&diff=753469&oldid=753356 "Badly rushed and badly written" article}} for no reason? This does not make much sense to me. I would suggest removing this until and unless humie makes another appearance. Also note that [[F-Sack]] didn't get a page until he reappeared a couple of times too. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 06:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC) | He's only appeared once, as a one-off joke. In addition, when the idea of giving him his own page was [[Talk:Fan Costumes 2015#ENTER HUMIDIBOT!|discussed]], that seemed to be the consensus. Then all of a sudden, a somewhat rude anonny shows up and {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fan_Costumes_2015&diff=next&oldid=753461 demands}} a page, and we suddenly create a {{p|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Humidibot&diff=753469&oldid=753356 "Badly rushed and badly written" article}} for no reason? This does not make much sense to me. I would suggest removing this until and unless humie makes another appearance. Also note that [[F-Sack]] didn't get a page until he reappeared a couple of times too. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 06:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
Line 6: | Line 5: | ||
:::I suppose you're right. Now for the love of suudsu, would someone clean this page up? It's terribly worded and the caption still says "Filthy Sack", probably left over from a copy-paste! {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 19:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC) | :::I suppose you're right. Now for the love of suudsu, would someone clean this page up? It's terribly worded and the caption still says "Filthy Sack", probably left over from a copy-paste! {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 19:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
::::Alright, I cleaned it up. How we lookin', gals? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 19:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC) | ::::Alright, I cleaned it up. How we lookin', gals? {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 19:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::Smooth and smarmy. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 20:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:04, 18 November 2015
Jumping the gun
He's only appeared once, as a one-off joke. In addition, when the idea of giving him his own page was discussed, that seemed to be the consensus. Then all of a sudden, a somewhat rude anonny shows up and demands a page, and we suddenly create a "Badly rushed and badly written" article for no reason? This does not make much sense to me. I would suggest removing this until and unless humie makes another appearance. Also note that F-Sack didn't get a page until he reappeared a couple of times too. — Defender1031*Talk 06:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- (I'm not that anonny). I think the humidibot had a big enough role to warrant a page. We have pages for other one off things (for example, the steaky steaky - I'm sure there are others). I don't think it's worthwhile to "wait until he has another appearance", as there's a good likelihood that he never will.76.19.199.237 13:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- There are plenty of other pseudocharacters who either only have one appearance as of now, or had pages back when they only had one appearance. Per precedent, I feel like this page more than qualifies as a pseudocharacter, considering he actually spoke. — MichaelXX2
18:46, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- I suppose you're right. Now for the love of suudsu, would someone clean this page up? It's terribly worded and the caption still says "Filthy Sack", probably left over from a copy-paste! — Defender1031*Talk 19:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Alright, I cleaned it up. How we lookin', gals? — Defender1031*Talk 19:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Smooth and smarmy. — MichaelXX2
20:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- Smooth and smarmy. — MichaelXX2
- Alright, I cleaned it up. How we lookin', gals? — Defender1031*Talk 19:49, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- I suppose you're right. Now for the love of suudsu, would someone clean this page up? It's terribly worded and the caption still says "Filthy Sack", probably left over from a copy-paste! — Defender1031*Talk 19:04, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
- There are plenty of other pseudocharacters who either only have one appearance as of now, or had pages back when they only had one appearance. Per precedent, I feel like this page more than qualifies as a pseudocharacter, considering he actually spoke. — MichaelXX2