Talk:Stylized Character Designs

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(→Alternate Reddest Radish Angles: Reply?)
m (→Decemberweenvent calendar)
 
(includes 10 intermediate revisions)
Line 1: Line 1:
 +
==Title==
If this page is going to stay (and I'm tempted to mark it for deletion), it really needs a better name than "Designs That Aren't Counted." Any suggestions? {{User:Homestar Coder/sig}} 21:05, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)
If this page is going to stay (and I'm tempted to mark it for deletion), it really needs a better name than "Designs That Aren't Counted." Any suggestions? {{User:Homestar Coder/sig}} 21:05, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)
::I was also tempted to mark this article for deletion. If we ultimately decide to keep this article, I would suggest an improved name: "Character Evolution Irregularities" {{User:The Paper/sig}} 21:13, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)
::I was also tempted to mark this article for deletion. If we ultimately decide to keep this article, I would suggest an improved name: "Character Evolution Irregularities" {{User:The Paper/sig}} 21:13, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)
Line 40: Line 41:
Should we have the character designs from [[Exaggerations]] in here? It seems appropriate enough.
Should we have the character designs from [[Exaggerations]] in here? It seems appropriate enough.
 +
:Makes sence. [[User:Dr. Savage|Dr. Savage]]
== Alternate Reddest Radish Angles ==
== Alternate Reddest Radish Angles ==
Line 45: Line 47:
[[The Reddest Radish#DVD Version]] claims there are at least 3 versions.  Does anyone have pictures? [[User:Bad Bad Guy|Bad Bad Guy]] 15:32, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
[[The Reddest Radish#DVD Version]] claims there are at least 3 versions.  Does anyone have pictures? [[User:Bad Bad Guy|Bad Bad Guy]] 15:32, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
:Ooh. Didn't someone find unused Reddest Radish designs by decompiling some more-recent toon? I could swear that happened, but can't find it right now... --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 17:25, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
:Ooh. Didn't someone find unused Reddest Radish designs by decompiling some more-recent toon? I could swear that happened, but can't find it right now... --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 17:25, 11 May 2007 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Sbemail 169 Deleted Scene ==
 +
 +
So, how about the storyboards for the [[Sbemail 169 Deleted Scene]] in which Coach Z has a nose, mouth, etc.?  {{User:AwkwardFire/sig}} 22:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 +
:Yes, I think that could count very well. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 22:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
== FAQ Cover ==
 +
 +
I don't think the cover of the site's FAQ should be included; the picture on the cover wasn't actually made by TBC, but was a piece of fan art they decided to use. Thus, it shouldn't count as a stylized design because it's someone else's interpretations of the characters and not the Chaps' work at all. I just wanted to see if anyone has a reason it should be kept on there before I delete it. [[User:Lucentas|Lucentas]] 03:17, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
 +
:Agree'd [[User:Dr. Savage|Dr. Savage]] 23:41, 2 November 2008 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Eyes ==
 +
 +
Would Strong Bad and The Cheat with eyeballs (in [[your edge]]) count? Because they don't usually look like that. {{User:Gfdgsgxgzgdrc/sig‎}} 04:39, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 +
:You mean the part where it's JUST eyeballs? No. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 09:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Decemberweenvent calendar ==
 +
 +
Can someone upload pics of all the chars -[[Special:Contributions/113.37.226.89|113.37.226.89]] 17:18, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
 +
:I'm on it ----[[User:Jeffjman|J∃ffJ]][[User_talk:Jeffjman|Ma]][[Special:Contributions/Jeffjman|n]][[File:jeffjsigchrismas.png|23px]] 18:21, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

Current revision as of 18:21, 1 December 2022

Contents

[edit] Title

If this page is going to stay (and I'm tempted to mark it for deletion), it really needs a better name than "Designs That Aren't Counted." Any suggestions? Homestar Coderhomestar-coder-sig.gif 21:05, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I was also tempted to mark this article for deletion. If we ultimately decide to keep this article, I would suggest an improved name: "Character Evolution Irregularities" —THE PAPER PREEEOW 21:13, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)
I was thinking something like 'Alternate Designs'... I'm not much for naming, though.
Experimental Designs, perhaps? I know that's what they were called on the character evolution talk page for a while... small_logo.pngUsername-talk 21:18, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)
How about Irregular Character Designs? — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 07:01, 16 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I like that these designs are all grouped somewhere, so I think the page content has merit. The name has got to go, of course, and unfortunately my naming abilities are on break right now. — It's dot com 21:21, 15 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Sorry, guys. I'm not that good at making up names for stuff. Anyway, I like "Character Evolution Irregularities". Poopsmith Z

"Stylized"?! The Super NES one doesn't look.. hmm.. "stylish" to me. More like "ugly", but that is not a good headline. Still thinks that Irregular Character Designs is better — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 16:33, 16 Jul 2005 (UTC)

"Stylized Character Designs" is much much better than the previous "Designs That Aren't Counted." -- Tom 16:43, 16 Jul 2005 (UTC)
It is better. But is it the best? — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 23:45, 16 Jul 2005 (UTC)

"Stylized" doesnt mean "Stylish" as in "pretty" it means "using artistic forms and conventions to create effects [1] ." - Dr Haggis - Talk 23:58, 16 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Oh. Ok, now I get it. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 08:31, 17 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I like this page, but Dancin' Bubs Strong Bad kinda feels out of place... --TROGGA! 15:21, 18 Jul 2005 (UTC)

I agree. —FireBird|Talk 17:01, 18 Jul 2005 (UTC)

How was that Dancin Bubs SB picture taken anydangway? The KOT covers up most of Strong Bad. --—↑Darklinkskywalker|Talk_|i did this stuff_↓ 03:28, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Probably using a Flash decompiler. It allows you to isolate and remove certain elements. — It's dot com 03:36, 26 Jul 2005 (UTC)

Do the drawings on the stinko manual count?--minibaseball.png Bkmlb(talk to me·stuff I did) 21:54, 18 Sep 2005 (UTC)

I'd think the ones of Stinkoman and 1-Up might. Maybe. They do look a bit unusual. --DorianGray

[edit] Other drawings

There are alot of drawings of charactes floting around the site. Strong Bad's head of his Screensaver, his caricature from vacation and maybe more. Are those count? — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 06:16, 8 Oct 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Exaggerations

Should we have the character designs from Exaggerations in here? It seems appropriate enough.

Makes sence. Dr. Savage

[edit] Alternate Reddest Radish Angles

The Reddest Radish#DVD Version claims there are at least 3 versions. Does anyone have pictures? Bad Bad Guy 15:32, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

Ooh. Didn't someone find unused Reddest Radish designs by decompiling some more-recent toon? I could swear that happened, but can't find it right now... --DorianGray 17:25, 11 May 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Sbemail 169 Deleted Scene

So, how about the storyboards for the Sbemail 169 Deleted Scene in which Coach Z has a nose, mouth, etc.? AwkwardFire 22:12, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

Yes, I think that could count very well. --DorianGray 22:14, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] FAQ Cover

I don't think the cover of the site's FAQ should be included; the picture on the cover wasn't actually made by TBC, but was a piece of fan art they decided to use. Thus, it shouldn't count as a stylized design because it's someone else's interpretations of the characters and not the Chaps' work at all. I just wanted to see if anyone has a reason it should be kept on there before I delete it. Lucentas 03:17, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Agree'd Dr. Savage 23:41, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Eyes

Would Strong Bad and The Cheat with eyeballs (in your edge) count? Because they don't usually look like that. Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 04:39, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

You mean the part where it's JUST eyeballs? No. — Defender1031*Talk 09:11, 3 June 2016 (UTC)

[edit] Decemberweenvent calendar

Can someone upload pics of all the chars -113.37.226.89 17:18, 1 December 2022 (UTC)

I'm on it ----J∃ffJMan 18:21, 1 December 2022 (UTC)
Personal tools