Talk:Malsynonymity
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
m (fix) |
(change to deletedtalk) |
||
| (includes 3 intermediate revisions) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | {{ | + | {{deletedtalk}} |
Malsynoymity looks similar to Malproposions, I don't see anything interesting about it, and it's incomplete. Good enough to be '''Delarted'''--[[Special:Contributions/209.148.176.136|209.148.176.136]] 01:26, 14 May 2010 (UTC) | Malsynoymity looks similar to Malproposions, I don't see anything interesting about it, and it's incomplete. Good enough to be '''Delarted'''--[[Special:Contributions/209.148.176.136|209.148.176.136]] 01:26, 14 May 2010 (UTC) | ||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::Umm, no one has edited the page in a month. What shall we do now? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 03:11, 14 June 2010 (UTC) | ::Umm, no one has edited the page in a month. What shall we do now? {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 03:11, 14 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
I would like to point out that (according to Google) this wiki is the '''only place on the web''' where the word ''Malsynonymity'' appears. Considering that the only occurrence listed is by good old Senor Cardgage (after a month of waiting), I think this article should be '''deleted'''.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 03:47, 14 June 2010 (UTC) | I would like to point out that (according to Google) this wiki is the '''only place on the web''' where the word ''Malsynonymity'' appears. Considering that the only occurrence listed is by good old Senor Cardgage (after a month of waiting), I think this article should be '''deleted'''.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 03:47, 14 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | :While I'm proud that the a wiki user created a Googlewhack, I agree. If after a month no one found anything to go on this page, then it probably shouldn't exist. {{User:Elcool/sig}} 03:53, 14 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Meh, this page isn't going anywhere. In over a month, no one thought of any examples, and honestly it is a one time deal. Besides, this is Cardgage we're talking about; saying something like that isn't really notable for him. '''Delete''' on the grounds of the show not having other possible examples.--[[User:Jellote|Jellote]] [[User talk:Jellote|wuz]] [[Special:Contributions/Jellote|here]] 19:40, 14 June 2010 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Yes, this page is an obvious joke. So '''delete'''. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 23:46, 21 August 2010 (UTC) | ||
Current revision as of 23:47, 21 August 2010
|
Malsynoymity looks similar to Malproposions, I don't see anything interesting about it, and it's incomplete. Good enough to be Delarted--209.148.176.136 01:26, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
- It's a completely different concept, and the fact that it's incomplete is EXACTLY why this discussion shouldn't be happening yet. Give the page some time to develop. — Defender1031*Talk 10:23, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
I would like to point out that (according to Google) this wiki is the only place on the web where the word Malsynonymity appears. Considering that the only occurrence listed is by good old Senor Cardgage (after a month of waiting), I think this article should be deleted. Loafing
03:47, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- While I'm proud that the a wiki user created a Googlewhack, I agree. If after a month no one found anything to go on this page, then it probably shouldn't exist. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 03:53, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- Meh, this page isn't going anywhere. In over a month, no one thought of any examples, and honestly it is a one time deal. Besides, this is Cardgage we're talking about; saying something like that isn't really notable for him. Delete on the grounds of the show not having other possible examples.--Jellote wuz here 19:40, 14 June 2010 (UTC)
- Yes, this page is an obvious joke. So delete. RickTommy (edits) 23:46, 21 August 2010 (UTC)
