Talk:Zombie Strong Bad
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(no) |
|||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
:::Yes, variation is good here. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 20:39, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | :::Yes, variation is good here. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 20:39, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
::::Decent page and information. Shouldn't be deleted completely, maybe we could merge it with some other article. [[User:Strong Sader|Strong Sader]] 22:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | ::::Decent page and information. Shouldn't be deleted completely, maybe we could merge it with some other article. [[User:Strong Sader|Strong Sader]] 22:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC) | ||
- | :::::I checked [[Minor Character Variations]], and it doesn't comply with this article. Plus, the "Character Variations" category is good. If it is to be merged, wouldn't things like [[Head | + | :::::I checked [[Minor Character Variations]], and it doesn't comply with this article. Plus, the "Character Variations" category is good. If it is to be merged, wouldn't things like [[Head Bad and Strong Body]] be merged as well? --{{User:Theyellowdart/sig}} 03:01, 14 March 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 03:02, 14 March 2007
This information needs to go on one of our various variations pages instead. — It's dot com 20:34, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- So what are you waiting for? Baleet it already. DeFender1031 20:36, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- I concur. There's a reason we made those. {post-conflict} Have you even read our deletion policy? We have to dicuss it first. — Lapper (talk) 20:38, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, variation is good here. Heimstern Läufer 20:39, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- Decent page and information. Shouldn't be deleted completely, maybe we could merge it with some other article. Strong Sader 22:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- I checked Minor Character Variations, and it doesn't comply with this article. Plus, the "Character Variations" category is good. If it is to be merged, wouldn't things like Head Bad and Strong Body be merged as well? --TheYellowDart—(t/c) 03:01, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
- Decent page and information. Shouldn't be deleted completely, maybe we could merge it with some other article. Strong Sader 22:28, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, variation is good here. Heimstern Läufer 20:39, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
- I concur. There's a reason we made those. {post-conflict} Have you even read our deletion policy? We have to dicuss it first. — Lapper (talk) 20:38, 13 March 2007 (UTC)