Talk:Stacked Items

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(things put on top of other things)
(→Needed?: Delete.)
Line 5: Line 5:
:: True. That is three, but are they notable? '''Nuetral, but maybe keep'''. --[[User:Jellote|Jellote]] 14:13, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
:: True. That is three, but are they notable? '''Nuetral, but maybe keep'''. --[[User:Jellote|Jellote]] 14:13, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
:::Jellote, why do you make pages if you're going to question the necessity? Make sure the page is one that should be there before you make it. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 15:33, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
:::Jellote, why do you make pages if you're going to question the necessity? Make sure the page is one that should be there before you make it. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 15:33, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
-
:::Are you guys serious?  There are dozens, if not hundreds of instances of items being stacked (just search the word "stack"), but is it really worth making a list?  I fail to see how this is a running gag. '''Delete''' [[User:Omnisweater|Omnisweater]] 15:38, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
+
::::Are you guys serious?  There are dozens, if not hundreds of instances of items being stacked (just search the word "stack"), but is it really worth making a list?  I fail to see how this is a running gag. '''Delete''' [[User:Omnisweater|Omnisweater]] 15:38, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
-
::::I hate to trot out the old cliche, but this seems like a [[HRWiki:Spoons|spoon!]] situation.  Stacked items are not terribly unusual and not notable.  '''Delete''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 15:59, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
+
:::::I hate to trot out the old cliche, but this seems like a [[HRWiki:Spoons|spoon!]] situation.  Stacked items are not terribly unusual and not notable.  '''Delete''' {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 15:59, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 +
::::::You guys are right. I never realized that before. '''Delete'''. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 16:17, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 16:17, 9 May 2009

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 

Needed?

Is this page really necessary? There are just two references. I'll put it in regular format, anyway. Thy Not Dennis (t/c) 13:55, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

Forgetting Play Date. ColdReactive 14:11, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
True. That is three, but are they notable? Nuetral, but maybe keep. --Jellote 14:13, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Jellote, why do you make pages if you're going to question the necessity? Make sure the page is one that should be there before you make it. Thy Not Dennis (t/c) 15:33, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Are you guys serious? There are dozens, if not hundreds of instances of items being stacked (just search the word "stack"), but is it really worth making a list? I fail to see how this is a running gag. Delete Omnisweater 15:38, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
I hate to trot out the old cliche, but this seems like a spoon! situation. Stacked items are not terribly unusual and not notable. Delete wbwolf (t | ed) 15:59, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
You guys are right. I never realized that before. Delete. Thy Not Dennis (t/c) 16:17, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Stacked_Items"
Personal tools