Talk:Names ending in -bert

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(→Should it stay or should it go?)
(rv, whaaaaaaat are you doing?)
Line 2: Line 2:
==Should it stay or should it go?==
==Should it stay or should it go?==
 +
I'm rather doubtful of the use of this page, since we have two instances of -bert.  It would seem like, at least for now, it be better to '''merge''' this [[Names ending in -face]], since its a similar gag. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 22:42, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
 +
:You could say the same for [[Names Ending in -erson]], but we won't merge that. I say '''delete'''. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 23:59, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
::'''merge''' [[Names ending in -face]], [[Names Ending in -erson]], and [[Names ending in -bert]] into [[strange name prefixes/suffixes]]
::'''merge''' [[Names ending in -face]], [[Names Ending in -erson]], and [[Names ending in -bert]] into [[strange name prefixes/suffixes]]
 +
:::'''No merge''', those other "names ending in" gags are strong enough to stand alone.  This, as it is, does not.  I don't know of any way to search for a partial word to know what other instances there are of names ending in -bert, but I can see there might be a few.  It's possible.  If no one can come up with more than the two that are currently in the article (and soon), '''delete''' until we have more.  {{User:OptimisticFool/sig}} 00:28, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 +
::::What Opti just said is what I was trying to say, just phrased better. '''Delete'''. {{User:Thy Not Dennis/sig}} 18:04, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
 +
:::::Well, i have a couple more... there's "Crambert" from [[replacement]], and "Terbert" from [[coloring]]... Given these that i pulled off the top of my head, i find it difficult to believe that there aren't even more of them floating around... I say that if we can find at least one or two more, we should '''keep''' it. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 18:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:07, 11 May 2009

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 


Should it stay or should it go?

I'm rather doubtful of the use of this page, since we have two instances of -bert. It would seem like, at least for now, it be better to merge this Names ending in -face, since its a similar gag. wbwolf (t | ed) 22:42, 9 May 2009 (UTC)

You could say the same for Names Ending in -erson, but we won't merge that. I say delete. Thy Not Dennis (t/c) 23:59, 9 May 2009 (UTC)
merge Names ending in -face, Names Ending in -erson, and Names ending in -bert into strange name prefixes/suffixes
No merge, those other "names ending in" gags are strong enough to stand alone. This, as it is, does not. I don't know of any way to search for a partial word to know what other instances there are of names ending in -bert, but I can see there might be a few. It's possible. If no one can come up with more than the two that are currently in the article (and soon), delete until we have more. OptimisticFool 00:28, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
What Opti just said is what I was trying to say, just phrased better. Delete. Thy Not Dennis (t/c) 18:04, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Well, i have a couple more... there's "Crambert" from replacement, and "Terbert" from coloring... Given these that i pulled off the top of my head, i find it difficult to believe that there aren't even more of them floating around... I say that if we can find at least one or two more, we should keep it. — Defender1031*Talk 18:21, 10 May 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Names_ending_in_-bert"
Personal tools