Talk:Photoshop
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(clarification of stuffs) |
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (no rename.) |
||
Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
The MS Paint page is not simply named "Paint", so why is this page not titled "Adobe Photoshop"? And yes, while there is already a page called [[Paint]], wouldn't it make more sense to have the "Adobe" prefix since it is a trademark and also differentiates itself from the verb of "photoshopping". - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 20:22, 17 May 2015 (UTC) | The MS Paint page is not simply named "Paint", so why is this page not titled "Adobe Photoshop"? And yes, while there is already a page called [[Paint]], wouldn't it make more sense to have the "Adobe" prefix since it is a trademark and also differentiates itself from the verb of "photoshopping". - {{User:Catjaz63/sig}} 20:22, 17 May 2015 (UTC) | ||
+ | :"Paint" is a word in and of itself. "Photoshop" only refers to the adobe product. Further, the act of "photoshopping" got its name for the same product, and I think that mentions of "photoshopping" DO belong on this page, and that therefore, we would specifically want it without the company name first. My vote would be for '''no rename'''. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 20:44, 17 May 2015 (UTC) |
Revision as of 20:44, 17 May 2015
Addition of Adobe
The MS Paint page is not simply named "Paint", so why is this page not titled "Adobe Photoshop"? And yes, while there is already a page called Paint, wouldn't it make more sense to have the "Adobe" prefix since it is a trademark and also differentiates itself from the verb of "photoshopping". - Catjaz63 20:22, 17 May 2015 (UTC)
- "Paint" is a word in and of itself. "Photoshop" only refers to the adobe product. Further, the act of "photoshopping" got its name for the same product, and I think that mentions of "photoshopping" DO belong on this page, and that therefore, we would specifically want it without the company name first. My vote would be for no rename. — Defender1031*Talk 20:44, 17 May 2015 (UTC)