Talk:X it out

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (moved Talk:X it up/out to Talk:X it out: "(verb) it out" is enough of a recurring gag that it deserves to be distinct)
(→New title and format)
Line 7: Line 7:
The idea behind this page is distinct from [[X 'em up]] (the construction and context is different), but I don't think it's strong enough to support its own page. This page should be '''deleted.''' — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 18:37, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
The idea behind this page is distinct from [[X 'em up]] (the construction and context is different), but I don't think it's strong enough to support its own page. This page should be '''deleted.''' — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 18:37, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
:Yes, I say '''delete''', too. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 08:32, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
:Yes, I say '''delete''', too. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 08:32, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
== New title and format ==
 +
 +
I tallied it up and I think there are enough nonsensical permutations of "(verb) it out" to warrant their own page. I'm relatively new to the wiki, is this all okay?

Revision as of 16:31, 26 April 2018

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 

Merge?

It's been pointed out to me that the page X 'em up already exists. Should this really be separate from that? — Defender1031*Talk 18:14, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

I think yes. hegtcX1.png Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 18:17, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Hecks yeah! X 'em up is no where close to this no matter wht you say! SaintOlaf 18:19, 9 April 2012 (UTC)
Those are neither very salient, nor even coherent points. Can either of you provide a logical reason why it should be separate, when the verbal formulation is so similar? — Defender1031*Talk 18:23, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

The idea behind this page is distinct from X 'em up (the construction and context is different), but I don't think it's strong enough to support its own page. This page should be deleted. — It's dot com 18:37, 9 April 2012 (UTC)

Yes, I say delete, too. RickTommy (edits) 08:32, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

New title and format

I tallied it up and I think there are enough nonsensical permutations of "(verb) it out" to warrant their own page. I'm relatively new to the wiki, is this all okay?

Retrieved from "http://hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:X_it_out"
Personal tools