Talk:Everything Else, Volume 1
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
BazookaJoe (Talk | contribs) (→TMBG commentary?) |
MibZelinda (Talk | contribs) (→TMBG commentary?) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
:No, it's not a mistake. It is They Might Be Giants. It is hard to understand though. The Chapos and some of the members are on the phone, and then another guy you can here perfectly. So, it is correct.--{{User:bkmlb/sig}} 22:46, 23 November 2005 (UTC) | :No, it's not a mistake. It is They Might Be Giants. It is hard to understand though. The Chapos and some of the members are on the phone, and then another guy you can here perfectly. So, it is correct.--{{User:bkmlb/sig}} 22:46, 23 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
:::-Edit conflict- It's on Ballad. Experimental Film has two commentaries: one from the website, and another one similar but different (I just said "similar but different"!). Ballad of The Sneak has two commentaries. They will be very hard to transcribe because they are on the phone and there are always 50 guys talking at once. The second commentary, if I figured it out, has the voice of one TMBG member having technical difficulties during the commentary. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 22:49, 23 November 2005 (UTC) | :::-Edit conflict- It's on Ballad. Experimental Film has two commentaries: one from the website, and another one similar but different (I just said "similar but different"!). Ballad of The Sneak has two commentaries. They will be very hard to transcribe because they are on the phone and there are always 50 guys talking at once. The second commentary, if I figured it out, has the voice of one TMBG member having technical difficulties during the commentary. —[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 22:49, 23 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::It's not They Might Be Giants. It's DaVinci's Notebook. Listen to the commentary. Yes, they say they are (in the first commentary), but it's ''just a joke'' and Mike corrects them after. Besides, why would TMBG be doing the commentary for a song they didn't write or perform? —{{User:Mibluvr13/sig}} 23:45, 23 November 2005 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:45, 23 November 2005
Category
I put in Category:Products because Strong Bad Sings and Other Type Hits is also listed there, but I think that there should be a DVD category. What do you think? — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 10:47, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
- Looks like we have Category:Strong Bad DVD but that just won't do here. I'm sure the community will think up something. Maybe along the lines of "Toons DVD" category? —THE PAPER PREEEOW 11:02, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
- Why don't we change the Strong Bad DVD to just a regular "DVDs". After all, Strong Bad DVD is technically incorrect as it's actually a Strong Bad Email DVD. - Joshua
- Create a category similar to Strong Bad DVD and stick everything in that one. Call it: Category:Everything Else DVD. And I won't argue if someone wants to move Strong Bad DVD to a better name. I've actually wanted to do that for a while. —BazookaJoe 12:44, 14 November 2005 (UTC)
- Why don't we change the Strong Bad DVD to just a regular "DVDs". After all, Strong Bad DVD is technically incorrect as it's actually a Strong Bad Email DVD. - Joshua
Aaah!!!!
Two things: I saw bubs's open mouth, and they mentioned the wiki. AAAAAAAAAAAHHH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Homfrog 21:39, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- We are famous now. The good times are over!
I R F 22:25, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
- It's not the first time. They also mentioned the Wiki on strongbad_email.exe Disc Four, in the animal commentary. --Jay (Gobble) 04:58, 17 November 2005 (UTC)
Okay, after looking a bit deeper, They say on the commentary for TGS7, the sd is a reference to "S D Special Delivery Jones". He's one o' their favorite wrestlemen. Homfrog 21:57, 16 November 2005 (UTC)
TMBG commentary?
Wait, there's really a TMBG commentary on this? I'd expect Experimental Film to have it, but it's Ballad of the Sneak... is this a mistake? Also, I'm getting the DVD in the mail within the next few days and I'd be more than happy to help out. (I sound weird...) --MrsCommanderson 22:42, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
- No, it's not a mistake. It is They Might Be Giants. It is hard to understand though. The Chapos and some of the members are on the phone, and then another guy you can here perfectly. So, it is correct.--
Bkmlb(talk to me·stuff I did) 22:46, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
- -Edit conflict- It's on Ballad. Experimental Film has two commentaries: one from the website, and another one similar but different (I just said "similar but different"!). Ballad of The Sneak has two commentaries. They will be very hard to transcribe because they are on the phone and there are always 50 guys talking at once. The second commentary, if I figured it out, has the voice of one TMBG member having technical difficulties during the commentary. —BazookaJoe 22:49, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
- It's not They Might Be Giants. It's DaVinci's Notebook. Listen to the commentary. Yes, they say they are (in the first commentary), but it's just a joke and Mike corrects them after. Besides, why would TMBG be doing the commentary for a song they didn't write or perform? —
Zelinda 23:45, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
- It's not They Might Be Giants. It's DaVinci's Notebook. Listen to the commentary. Yes, they say they are (in the first commentary), but it's just a joke and Mike corrects them after. Besides, why would TMBG be doing the commentary for a song they didn't write or perform? —
- -Edit conflict- It's on Ballad. Experimental Film has two commentaries: one from the website, and another one similar but different (I just said "similar but different"!). Ballad of The Sneak has two commentaries. They will be very hard to transcribe because they are on the phone and there are always 50 guys talking at once. The second commentary, if I figured it out, has the voice of one TMBG member having technical difficulties during the commentary. —BazookaJoe 22:49, 23 November 2005 (UTC)
