Talk:Best/Worst X Ever
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Deletion: opinion) |
(→Deletion: comment) |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
I don't see how these occurances are notable. "Best/worst X ever" is a common phrase. There is nothing special or funny about "best Decemberween ever", for example. The article should be '''deleted'''.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 00:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC) | I don't see how these occurances are notable. "Best/worst X ever" is a common phrase. There is nothing special or funny about "best Decemberween ever", for example. The article should be '''deleted'''.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 00:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
:'''Not''' if those other two articles are merged. Otherwise, '''get rid of it, pronto.''' --{{User:Sysrq868/sig}} 00:20, 14 January 2008 (UTC) | :'''Not''' if those other two articles are merged. Otherwise, '''get rid of it, pronto.''' --{{User:Sysrq868/sig}} 00:20, 14 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::I agree with Loafing's argument. Furthermore, the notion of this article as a running gag seems problematic to me. Running gags are incidents that derive their humor or interest from repetition in contexts where they can be identified with one another. I'm not seeing this here, as there's nothing that seems to relate all these appearances to each other. At this point, I would support deletion. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 00:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:21, 14 January 2008
Deletion
I don't see how these occurances are notable. "Best/worst X ever" is a common phrase. There is nothing special or funny about "best Decemberween ever", for example. The article should be deleted. Loafing
00:06, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- Not if those other two articles are merged. Otherwise, get rid of it, pronto. --Sysrq868 00:20, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with Loafing's argument. Furthermore, the notion of this article as a running gag seems problematic to me. Running gags are incidents that derive their humor or interest from repetition in contexts where they can be identified with one another. I'm not seeing this here, as there's nothing that seems to relate all these appearances to each other. At this point, I would support deletion. Heimstern Läufer
00:21, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- I agree with Loafing's argument. Furthermore, the notion of this article as a running gag seems problematic to me. Running gags are incidents that derive their humor or interest from repetition in contexts where they can be identified with one another. I'm not seeing this here, as there's nothing that seems to relate all these appearances to each other. At this point, I would support deletion. Heimstern Läufer
