Talk:Character Video Transcripts
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Meaty85203 (Talk | contribs) (→Combined article) |
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) (the heart of the issue hasn't been addressed) |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
::Yes I did, I say '''Keep''', there's too much of this clicking to find the Character Transcipts of everyone, besides, this is ''is'' easier, Thank you [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]], I know I'll make this worth, two is all I could do, I say all the Transcripts etc. moved here.<br> [[User:Meaty85203|Meaty85203]] 00:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC) | ::Yes I did, I say '''Keep''', there's too much of this clicking to find the Character Transcipts of everyone, besides, this is ''is'' easier, Thank you [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]], I know I'll make this worth, two is all I could do, I say all the Transcripts etc. moved here.<br> [[User:Meaty85203|Meaty85203]] 00:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::Unless someone wants it in different Articles? Anyone, Nowone [[Hremail 62|Mooooo... Mooooooooooo]] [[User:Meaty85203|Meaty85203]] 00:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC) | :::Unless someone wants it in different Articles? Anyone, Nowone [[Hremail 62|Mooooo... Mooooooooooo]] [[User:Meaty85203|Meaty85203]] 00:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::Michael: The article was previously deleted because the information is elsewhere. As I explained in my first post, however, there are ways to get around violating the once-and-only-once rule (by moving the data or using templates), and we organize the same data different ways all the time if we think it serves the reader (for example, all the Strong Bad Email lists). The issue of whether a combined page should be created for quick viewing has not to my knowledge been addressed, and should be. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 00:12, 27 February 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:12, 27 February 2009
Combined article
There are potentially two questions to answer: (1) Should this be done? (2) If so, how should it be done? For the first question, I for one think it might be a good and quick way to read all the transcripts, and I like the way it groups similar things together. On the other hand, is it really that hard to go through each character's page? As for the second question, to avoid duplicating work, either the transcripts should all be moved here or some templates set up to include the verbiage both here and on each character's page. I'd go for the second option, since it requires less clicking for the reader. — It's dot com 23:49, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- This has been brought up again? I say delete, since a sysop who knew what he was doing deleted it. Delete once more. — MichaelXX2
23:50, 26 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yes I did, I say Keep, there's too much of this clicking to find the Character Transcipts of everyone, besides, this is is easier, Thank you It's dot com, I know I'll make this worth, two is all I could do, I say all the Transcripts etc. moved here.
Meaty85203 00:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC)- Unless someone wants it in different Articles? Anyone, Nowone Mooooo... Mooooooooooo Meaty85203 00:02, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Michael: The article was previously deleted because the information is elsewhere. As I explained in my first post, however, there are ways to get around violating the once-and-only-once rule (by moving the data or using templates), and we organize the same data different ways all the time if we think it serves the reader (for example, all the Strong Bad Email lists). The issue of whether a combined page should be created for quick viewing has not to my knowledge been addressed, and should be. — It's dot com 00:12, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
- Yes I did, I say Keep, there's too much of this clicking to find the Character Transcipts of everyone, besides, this is is easier, Thank you It's dot com, I know I'll make this worth, two is all I could do, I say all the Transcripts etc. moved here.
