Talk:Nonexistent Strong Bad Emails

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(page shows promise; give it some time to develop before nominating it for discussion)
(Needed?: in case this was necessary.)
Line 6: Line 6:
::::Agreeing with YK.  '''Keep''' it. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 00:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
::::Agreeing with YK.  '''Keep''' it. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 00:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
:::::Also with YK.. '''Keep'''.-{{User:Record307/sig}} 00:31, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
:::::Also with YK.. '''Keep'''.-{{User:Record307/sig}} 00:31, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
 +
::::::Agreeing with the agreeing with YK. '''Keep'''. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.151.26|132.183.151.26]] 01:28, 11 March 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 01:28, 11 March 2009

Needed?

There haven't been enough references to make this a good page, and the references on the page aren't even relevant. Delete. MichaelXX2 mail_icon.gif link_icon.gif 23:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

I don't know what you mean by both references being "relevant". Both of the examples given fit the page's description, and there is at least a third that I'm aware of (and personal favorites can be greatly expanded.) I think it's deserving of a clean-up, a merge if not a keep, and certainly not a delete. --Jay (Talk) 23:29, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
I think this is a rather interesting concept. Strong Bad *has* mentioned, and even shown flashbacks to, numerous "e-mails" that don't actually exist. It needs a cleanup, but I see no reason why this page should be deleted... Keep. -YKHi. I'm Ayjo! 00:21, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Certainly a valid article. Keep. — Defender1031*Talk 00:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Agreeing with YK. Keep it. —Guard Duck talk 00:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Also with YK.. Keep.-Record307 Talk/Contribs 00:31, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Agreeing with the agreeing with YK. Keep. -132.183.151.26 01:28, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
Personal tools