Talk:Nonexistent Strong Bad Emails
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
It's dot com (Talk | contribs) (page shows promise; give it some time to develop before nominating it for discussion) |
(→Needed?: in case this was necessary.) |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::::Agreeing with YK. '''Keep''' it. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 00:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC) | ::::Agreeing with YK. '''Keep''' it. {{User:GuardDuck/sig}} 00:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
:::::Also with YK.. '''Keep'''.-{{User:Record307/sig}} 00:31, 11 March 2009 (UTC) | :::::Also with YK.. '''Keep'''.-{{User:Record307/sig}} 00:31, 11 March 2009 (UTC) | ||
+ | ::::::Agreeing with the agreeing with YK. '''Keep'''. -[[Special:Contributions/132.183.151.26|132.183.151.26]] 01:28, 11 March 2009 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:28, 11 March 2009
Needed?
There haven't been enough references to make this a good page, and the references on the page aren't even relevant. Delete. — MichaelXX2 23:25, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- I don't know what you mean by both references being "relevant". Both of the examples given fit the page's description, and there is at least a third that I'm aware of (and personal favorites can be greatly expanded.) I think it's deserving of a clean-up, a merge if not a keep, and certainly not a delete. --Jay (Talk) 23:29, 10 March 2009 (UTC)
- I think this is a rather interesting concept. Strong Bad *has* mentioned, and even shown flashbacks to, numerous "e-mails" that don't actually exist. It needs a cleanup, but I see no reason why this page should be deleted... Keep. -YK 00:21, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- Certainly a valid article. Keep. — Defender1031*Talk 00:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- Agreeing with YK. Keep it. —Guard Duck talk 00:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- Also with YK.. Keep.-Record307 Talk/Contribs 00:31, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- Agreeing with the agreeing with YK. Keep. -132.183.151.26 01:28, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- Also with YK.. Keep.-Record307 Talk/Contribs 00:31, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- Agreeing with YK. Keep it. —Guard Duck talk 00:30, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- Certainly a valid article. Keep. — Defender1031*Talk 00:29, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
- I think this is a rather interesting concept. Strong Bad *has* mentioned, and even shown flashbacks to, numerous "e-mails" that don't actually exist. It needs a cleanup, but I see no reason why this page should be deleted... Keep. -YK 00:21, 11 March 2009 (UTC)