Talk:Toons By Length
From Homestar Runner Wiki
m (→Sub-page?: oops) |
GreenHelmet (Talk | contribs) (→Obsolete) |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
:That page already have enought tables as it is. It's fine the way it is. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 21:17, 19 February 2006 (UTC) | :That page already have enought tables as it is. It's fine the way it is. {{User:E.L. Cool/sig}} 21:17, 19 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == Obsolete == | ||
| + | |||
| + | I just added about a dozen toons to this page that weren't there. Given that the tables on the [[Toons]] page can be sorted by any column (including length), I think we should consider getting rid of this page. {{User:GreenHelmet/sig}} 00:52, 4 June 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:52, 4 June 2009
Do you think we should do the shorts, too? Because I'd be willing to help out with those. That would be useful for the article (at least I think so). ♥ teeeffoh! 20:16, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, I am planning on doing those later. Rogue Leader / (my talk) 20:19, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- Well, would you place them on the same page, or make a "shorts by length?" Because if nobody thinks it's totally not awesome, I can start on it right...about...now. ♥ teeeffoh! 20:20, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- You can do it. I recommend putting them here and also put down the Holiday Toons. Rogue Leader / (my talk) 20:22, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- We still have some choices here before we go barging ahead with this. I think having them all on one page is good, but I don't know about other people. Also, do we want one table with all of the toons, shorts, and holiday toons; 3 separate tables; or both? Let's wait for some opinions before we go ahead with this.
Username-talk 20:23, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- We still have some choices here before we go barging ahead with this. I think having them all on one page is good, but I don't know about other people. Also, do we want one table with all of the toons, shorts, and holiday toons; 3 separate tables; or both? Let's wait for some opinions before we go ahead with this.
- You can do it. I recommend putting them here and also put down the Holiday Toons. Rogue Leader / (my talk) 20:22, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- Well, would you place them on the same page, or make a "shorts by length?" Because if nobody thinks it's totally not awesome, I can start on it right...about...now. ♥ teeeffoh! 20:20, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Sub-page?
Although I agree that the information on this page is useful, I kind of think that a lot of this is just redundant of the Toons page. Perhaps make this a sub-section, or sub-page of thate page. I just think that the information will be better-used there, especially since this page is currently orphaned. ♥ teeeffoh! 21:15, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- That page already have enought tables as it is. It's fine the way it is. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 21:17, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
Obsolete
I just added about a dozen toons to this page that weren't there. Given that the tables on the Toons page can be sorted by any column (including length), I think we should consider getting rid of this page. 
Green Helmet 00:52, 4 June 2009 (UTC)
