Talk:Lengthy Email Pauses
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (deletedtalk pending actual deletion) |
|||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
::: Even with more examples, so what? So he often doesn't read the entire email straight through without commenting in the middle, making fun of spelling, the sender's name, etc. This is not notable at all, and my opinion has not changed since 3 years ago. I still say '''delete'''. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 19:16, 15 August 2015 (UTC) | ::: Even with more examples, so what? So he often doesn't read the entire email straight through without commenting in the middle, making fun of spelling, the sender's name, etc. This is not notable at all, and my opinion has not changed since 3 years ago. I still say '''delete'''. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 19:16, 15 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::: Alrighty. I agree. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 19:24, 15 August 2015 (UTC) | :::: Alrighty. I agree. {{User:Broncotroll/sig}} 19:24, 15 August 2015 (UTC) | ||
+ | :::::Let me just point out that this article refers specifically to pauses that are so lengthy that they get their own line in the transcript. {{User:RickTommy/sig}} 06:00, 19 July 2016 (UTC) |
Revision as of 06:00, 19 July 2016
![]() |
Is this really noteworthy?
First of all, it's pretty subjective as written. Is Strong Bad's "Period. That's the best sentence ever written!" in yes, wrestling "lengthy" enough? Secondly, it's just a list of times Strong Bad interrupts reading the email, which I don't feel is all that noteworthy. --Jay (Gobble) 05:35, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- Yeah, I'm not really sure this is too great either, for the reasons already mentioned. — Defender1031*Talk 08:13, 21 December 2012 (UTC)
- Agree. This article just lists some slight tangents. And it's a massive stub with a misleading name. It could be good if it listed more examples though. --
BroncoTroll☺ 08:25, 13 August 2015 (UTC)
- Even with more examples, so what? So he often doesn't read the entire email straight through without commenting in the middle, making fun of spelling, the sender's name, etc. This is not notable at all, and my opinion has not changed since 3 years ago. I still say delete. — Defender1031*Talk 19:16, 15 August 2015 (UTC)
- Agree. This article just lists some slight tangents. And it's a massive stub with a misleading name. It could be good if it listed more examples though. --