Template talk:bottom10

From Homestar Runner Wiki

This is the talk page of a deleted article. Please do not participate in the discussions archived here. If you can provide a reason for the existence of this page that hasn't been discussed below, you may start a new section. Please refer to the inclusion guidelines that are generally applied to judge an article's merit.

Needed?

Is a template like this really necessary? If someone wants the code, they can just get it off the Main Page Talk Page. — MichaelXX2 20:59, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Supposing they don't know it's on the Main Page talk... --DorianGray 21:00, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Then they'd have to know this template is here. I don't think this code is (or should be) widespread enough to warrant a template. — It's dot com 21:01, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

If they really want a code like this so bad, they can get the code from somewhere or ask a sysop. Too many templates spoil the wiki. Maybe if I made a page like this as a mock-up on my namespace so users could use that instead. Like {{User:MichaelXX2/bottom10}} or something. — MichaelXX2 21:06, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

I say keep it. (Granted I made it, but still.) People would use this! Don't you think? It's easier than going to the main page and getting the code.--Thy Not Dennis (^t/_c) 21:07, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

But this template isn't contributing to the wiki. It's just here to use on namespaces, which you could do with my option above. — MichaelXX2 21:08, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Do userboxes contribute to the wiki?--Thy Not Dennis (^t/_c) 21:12, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Not really, but they aren't templates like this. Two wrongs don't make a right. — MichaelXX2 21:13, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

True, but three rights make a left. :P Seriously though, I think it should stay. A bottom 10 is a common thing for userpages, this template makes it easier to put like the email.--Thy Not Dennis (^t/_c) 21:51, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

You'd still have to find the template. — MichaelXX2 22:02, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

But the template makes it easier to type, and you have to find it on the main page too.--Thy Not Dennis (^t/_c) 22:03, 23 March 2009 (UTC)

Also, the main page talk page has been archived since then, and I have no idea which archive it's in. I say keep it. Flicky1991 18:59, 24 March 2009 (UTC)

I give keep for it! I can't find the template in the main page talk page archive. Just keep it or baleet all other templates! --Fangoriously 01:33, 27 March 2009 (UTC)

3 to 1, Michael old boy.--Thy Not Dennis (^t/_c) 15:14, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

Like Michael said, the template is not contributing to the wiki and is not a priority, so, Deleted.Record307 ^Talk/_Contribs 15:19, 28 March 2009 (UTC)

But it's still only three-to-two marny! How can you delete it on a three-to-two marny?--Thy Not Dennis (^t/_c) 18:49, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

That's three to three, mind you. If you want the template so bad, just use the code. The real link is here. — MichaelXX2 05:40, 5 April 2009 (UTC)

See, I told you. Now the page has been deleted. — MichaelXX2 05:56, 5 April 2009 (UTC)