Talk:Stinkoman and 1-Up's Relationship
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Revision as of 04:52, 4 July 2009 by Heimstern Läufer (Talk | contribs)
Your James Over
No. No. The Character Relationship articles are only for the main 12 and only then when there is something significant about it. Delete wbwolf (t | ed) 13:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)
- I don't even think there needs to be a discussion. We don't keep relationship pages about any but the main characters. — Defender1031*Talk 18:44, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
- I think this should be deleted because of the rule that you can only do the main 12. Honestly, this page is very poorly written and while that can be fixed, I have no idea how. — MichaelXX2
15:19, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with you XX2, relationship pages should only be between the 12 main characters and the page is poor written. My vote: Delete.--
'Record307 Talk/Contribs 15:22, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- And aside from the blanket rule thing, the relationship isn't all that interesting. The salient parts could be (and probably are already) on their respective character pages. -132.183.138.86 15:28, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
- I agree with you XX2, relationship pages should only be between the 12 main characters and the page is poor written. My vote: Delete.--
- I think this should be deleted because of the rule that you can only do the main 12. Honestly, this page is very poorly written and while that can be fixed, I have no idea how. — MichaelXX2
I haven't decided yet if this article is worth keeping, but from where exactly did you get the notion that relationship articles are only for the Main 12? I oppose this, and I would gladly support a good article the explores a relationship between a main and a minor character, or even two minor characters. What floodgates are you talking about? Those of some new interesting articles? Those of a few deletion discussions? We do this regularly anyways. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 04:45, 4 July 2009 (UTC)
- Concur with Elcool. There's absolutely no rule restricting relationship articles to the main 12, nor should there be. If an interesting article can be formed about others, it should stay. This one, as it stands, doesn't have enough info to make it worthwhile, but I think it might be salvageable with some research. Heimstern Läufer
04:52, 4 July 2009 (UTC)