Talk:Stinkoman and 1-Up's Relationship

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

[edit] Your James Over

No. No. The Character Relationship articles are only for the main 12 and only then when there is something significant about it. Delete wbwolf (t | ed) 13:44, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

I don't even think there needs to be a discussion. We don't keep relationship pages about any but the main characters. — Defender1031*Talk 18:44, 2 July 2009 (UTC)
I think this should be deleted because of the rule that you can only do the main 12. Honestly, this page is very poorly written and while that can be fixed, I have no idea how. MichaelXX2 mail_icon.gif link_icon.gif 15:19, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
I agree with you XX2, relationship pages should only be between the 12 main characters and the page is poor written. My vote: Delete.--'Record307 Talk/Contribs 15:22, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
And aside from the blanket rule thing, the relationship isn't all that interesting. The salient parts could be (and probably are already) on their respective character pages. - 15:28, 3 July 2009 (UTC)
If we keep this article, it's just going to open the floodgates and there'd be a muddle. The relationships between minor characters should be discussed on their respective articles, not on character-type articles. Delete.The Chort 18:01, 3 July 2009 (UTC)

I haven't decided yet if this article is worth keeping, but from where exactly did you get the notion that relationship articles are only for the Main 12? I oppose this, and I would gladly support a good article the explores a relationship between a main and a minor character, or even two minor characters. What floodgates are you talking about? Those of some new interesting articles? Those of a few deletion discussions? We do this regularly anyways. Elcool (talk)(contribs) 04:45, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Concur with Elcool. There's absolutely no rule restricting relationship articles to the main 12, nor should there be. If an interesting article can be formed about others, it should stay. This one, as it stands, doesn't have enough info to make it worthwhile, but I think it might be salvageable with some research. Heimstern Läufer 04:52, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Personally, I say rewrite.. There's alot information missed, and the article itself is of poor quality, but it most certianly can be fixed and made very intersting. -SI. Keep the page because peoples relationships are changing all the time.just think of marshie and Homestars.He hated him then he said nothing on sbcg4ap.-R1998

{Picks up microphone from the table and walks up to the stage} {Touches mike with palm of hand} Testing, testing. Hi. Hello. Aloha. I see that this discussion has went from almost speedy deletion to rewrite. During this discussion, it seems that Character Relationships may no longer be exclusive to the main 12. Now, I can safely say that this could be good in some cases (like maybe Strong Bad and Senor Cardgage's Relationship) but...20X6 Marzipan and El Pardock's Relationship. So, minor character relationships may and will be good on occasions, but it need not overwhelm us. The Character Relationships have never really had much guidelines, and have been sketchy many times. This article, on the other hand, I'm not sure. I guess it could stay, but I want more than just the game in the instances. I'm sure worse ones will come though. But, the lame ones could always get deleted. But for borderline ones like these, it should be important that it gets a full examinations and not just 10 different people yelling out some old Strong Bad quote. I was probably redundant there a few times, but oh well. I think you got my point at least once. {Hops off the stage and puts the mike back, breaking a few props in the process} -free 00:23, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Yeah. We should get rid of it. The relationship pages are REALLY for the main 12. I mean, with we have a page for Stinkoman and 1-Up's Relationship, why not make a relationship page for Homeschool Winner and Champeen? User:doctorwho295 July 6, 2009

Well, the thing is, Stinkoman and 1-Up have interacted with each other multiple times, while Homeschool and Champeen have never actually *said* anything. That said, I'm still not sure whether this should stay, and if we start doing relationships that aren't about the main 12, than this probably isn't the place to start. free 23:03, 6 July 2009 (UTC)

Also homeschool and champeen have never been in a cartoon but both stinkoman and 1-Up have and they have always been talking and expressing themselves.Champeen, The ungluts, and homestars siblings should never have a relationship page because they don't exist. Rozz1998

I think it deserves to live. Apparently main 12 isn't an actual rule, ex, here. Espemon333 00:22, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Agreed. I'll give it an overhaul.--FIFTH GREG! HRWiki Greg 22:57, 7 January 2010 (UTC)
I've given the page some much needed clean-up and I can't see any reason why it should be delorted. Might need a better picture though. Keep Guybrush20X6 14:00, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
There still isn't much here, and their interactions are neither consistent enough nor wildly INconsistent enough to make for a very interesting article. I still say delete — Defender1031*Talk 14:03, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Well it has more content than Pom Pom and the Poopsmith's relationship Guybrush20X6 14:27, 3 May 2010 (UTC)
Yes, but that relationship is more the joke of them being silent together. Here, it is just two characters with very little appearances. Cardgage is a frequent on the site, while these two are just, well, variations. Maybe if there is a large number of 20X6 toons later, but now it won't work. Plus, these two are just standard Anime rivals: never cruel but also never chummy. It doesn't go much deeper. Delete.--Jellote wuz here 21:42, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
All told, I find the slightly different behaviours toward each other exhibited on this page interesting enough to merit keeping. Heimstern Läufer 11:09, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Uh, Keepface Guybrush20X6 00:35, 29 December 2010 (UTC)
KEEP!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 00:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
Considering Senor Cardgage has had more appearances than both Stinkoman and 1-Up combined, that's not the best evidence for this page.--Jellote wuz here 02:12, 22 January 2012 (UTC)
I say keep, too. RickTommy (edits) 04:14, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Since there is not really that much content, I say we merge it with 20X6, Stinkoman or 1-Up. And if that won't work I say we delete it, because it isn't really significant enough to be an article. Tenerence Love  18:07, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

I say delete since these are only for the main twelve, and merge with minor character relationships. --Image:Homsariconformysig.gifBroncoTroll 05:30, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
That's not entirely correct. RickTommy (edits) 05:38, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Also, there's no such page as "minor character relationships". Consensus was to not have one like that in the main namespace. — Defender1031*Talk 05:42, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
Oh, that's interesting. I wonder why. Seems notable. Probably because they became lists of meaningless interactions. --Image:Homsariconformysig.gifBroncoTroll 05:58, 16 August 2015 (UTC)

I backed this all up to the sandbox minor character interactions page so feel free to delete this page. It's been nearly 10 years since 1-up last appeared anyway. Wonder when he'll return... Guybrush20X6 01:18, 21 September 2017 (UTC)

I still think this should be definitely keep'd. It contains useful information on the relationship and interactions of these two characters. This page covers the various aspects of their relationship. They're not minor characters, and have interacted many times, so there's a difference between this and, say, [[Mario Paint Strong Sad and Lifty Fernandez's Relationship]]. (Also, why do so many people say that relationship pages are only for the main 12? That's not a rule! Where is that written anywhere?!) Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 06:42, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
It's not. However, for the most part, the main 12 are the only ones who interact enough for articles. RickTommy (edits) 07:36, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Personal tools