HRWiki talk:Projects

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Filmographies

I believe the Strong Bad E-mails are now all updated with filmographies. If someone would like to double check, that'd be cool. - Grumblebaker [9 Oct '04 00:27 CDT]

I have made the Category: Strong Bad Email a sub-cat of the Strong Bad Filmography. This is much more logical and reduces clutter in the Category: Strong Bad Filmography. This means all emails should be categorized as email only and not directly in the filmography. Drhaggis 09:44, 10 Oct 2004 (MST)

I have gone through all the Strong Bad Emails and removed the Category: Strong Bad Filmography from each. - Drhaggis 11:05, 10 Oct 2004 (MST)

Does this mean that everything's done with respect to emails & filmographies, and thus can be removed from the project list? - Grumblebaker 11 Oct '04 19:26 CDT

Well, I just double checked it, so I am removing the email portion from the project list with regard to filmographies. - Grumblebaker 16 Oct '04 10:25 CDT

The Answering Machines and TGSs are done as well. - Grumblebaker 16 Oct '04 21:20 CDT, edit 23 Oct '04 14:24 CDT

Hey, so thejesterx brought up a good point elsewhere in that there are Strong Bad Emails without Strong Bad and thus should not contribute to his filmography. Should I undo the previous doings? - Grumblebaker 23 Oct '04 14:24 CDT

Yes, I think that this should be undone for that very reason. — InterruptorJones[[]]

Thumbnailing Pictures

Should this be a Wiki Project? It seems like everyone is doing it anyway. fahooglewitz1077

It is listed under the "Standardizing Pages" header. --JoeyDay 09:05, 26 Oct 2004 (MST)

Organizing Projects

We need someone (I might do it later today) to go through our projects and figure out which ones are done and precisely where work still requires completion. It would be great to have little charts under each project so people know right where to go.

As an example, for a project involving Strong Bad Emails:

• Complete: 1-95, 103, 116
• Incomplete: 96-102, 104-115

This gets a little harder for most of our projects because they aren't limited to any one category of pages on our wiki. We should come up with a unified, standardized way of notating which pages on the wiki have been done. Ideas? --JoeyDay 09:24, 26 Oct 2004 (MST)