Talk:The Strongs' Capsela
From Homestar Runner Wiki
This is probably the most pointless page I've ever seen. Can we delete it? — talk Bubsty edits 18:50, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
- Pointless? It covers an item from the Homestar Runner universe. I'm sure there are lots of people that think even having a Wiki dedicated to recording everything about an online cartoon is pointless. No, we don't delete articles just because someone thinks they are pointless. -- Tom 18:52, 11 November 2005 (UTC)
- oh yes we do. i'm going with bubsty. see ya. Seriously 18:50, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
don't you think this should be deleted? not only does it make an extremely small cameo, but it is unclear where it came from. i mean, why make an article about something that doesn't have even the smallest influence on the caracters?m Seriously 18:53, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- I've gotta side with Tom. I'd never heard of this before this page was made. I mean, it could use a bit of fixage, but it's definently worth something. ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 19:01, 30 December 2005 (UTC)
- I only have one condition for keeping: fix that pic! It looks kinda bad. But otherwise, this is a good article, with actual info on an actual object. --DorianGray
- ah well. maybe you guys are right. but only 'cause it's thunderbird!!!!Seriously 03:58, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
- I have no vote either way, but I'd like to point out: um, doesn't this have a mention in Homestar Presents: Presents#Real-World References? In fact, there's more info on it there than in this article! If that fact were linked to the 'Pedia article instead of here, what would be missing? {Disclaimer: Because of my "there's a reason for stubs" doctrine, I could also be in favor of keeping it.} —AbdiViklas 21:32, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
- I think this page should be a stub. We don't know much about it. It may appear in another cartoon. Maybe as a car or something else. But seriously, instead of deleting it, I think it should be a stub. Bluebry muffin 14:06, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- I have no vote either way, but I'd like to point out: um, doesn't this have a mention in Homestar Presents: Presents#Real-World References? In fact, there's more info on it there than in this article! If that fact were linked to the 'Pedia article instead of here, what would be missing? {Disclaimer: Because of my "there's a reason for stubs" doctrine, I could also be in favor of keeping it.} —AbdiViklas 21:32, 2 January 2006 (UTC)
- ah well. maybe you guys are right. but only 'cause it's thunderbird!!!!Seriously 03:58, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
- I only have one condition for keeping: fix that pic! It looks kinda bad. But otherwise, this is a good article, with actual info on an actual object. --DorianGray
I'm thinking that this should be deleted, and we need to make a rule/guideline for dealing with minor item pages. It should be something like this: Items should have a page of their own only if they play a prominent role in a toon, or are an extemely important item in the H*R universe. Granted, this is still subjective, but it makes the decision a little easier. Using this rule, we can say that School Paste should be deleted, and King Castlefunny Pencil Moistener is only hanging on by a thread and could very well be deleted. —BazookaJoe 14:36, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- I don't mind this page. I think that it is a nice article and is pretty nice to have. And blueberry muffin, a stub isn't a short article. It is an article that can be expanded on. Rogue Leader / (my talk) 16:19, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- 'Keep. This page is informative on a real-life product used on the site. Not everyone knows about it (like me) and it's too big to belong in a single Fun FactTM. Articles about small things like that is why I love this wiki. Somewhere, some fan likes this game and search for it on the wiki. Do you want to disappoint him? — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 17:10, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
Wiki?
Shouldn't the external link be to the wikipedia? like, here? I know it's not a very good description, but I thought it was the rules or something. SaltyTalk! 04:24, 6 December 2005 (UTC)