Talk:Toons By Length
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Do you think we should do the shorts, too? Because I'd be willing to help out with those. That would be useful for the article (at least I think so). ♥ teeeffoh! 20:16, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- Yes, I am planning on doing those later. Rogue Leader / (my talk) 20:19, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- Well, would you place them on the same page, or make a "shorts by length?" Because if nobody thinks it's totally not awesome, I can start on it right...about...now. ♥ teeeffoh! 20:20, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- You can do it. I recommend putting them here and also put down the Holiday Toons. Rogue Leader / (my talk) 20:22, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- We still have some choices here before we go barging ahead with this. I think having them all on one page is good, but I don't know about other people. Also, do we want one table with all of the toons, shorts, and holiday toons; 3 separate tables; or both? Let's wait for some opinions before we go ahead with this.
Username-talk 20:23, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- We still have some choices here before we go barging ahead with this. I think having them all on one page is good, but I don't know about other people. Also, do we want one table with all of the toons, shorts, and holiday toons; 3 separate tables; or both? Let's wait for some opinions before we go ahead with this.
- You can do it. I recommend putting them here and also put down the Holiday Toons. Rogue Leader / (my talk) 20:22, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
- Well, would you place them on the same page, or make a "shorts by length?" Because if nobody thinks it's totally not awesome, I can start on it right...about...now. ♥ teeeffoh! 20:20, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Sub-page?
Although I agree that the information on this page is useful, I kind of think that a lot of this is just redundant of the Toons page. Perhaps make this a sub-section, or sub-page of thate page. I just think that the information will be better-used there, especially since this page is currently orphaned. ♥ teeeffoh! 21:15, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
- That page already have enought tables as it is. It's fine the way it is. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 21:17, 19 February 2006 (UTC)
