Talk:Strong Bad is on Point

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 01:11, 26 February 2009 by 132.183.138.34 (Talk)
Jump to: navigation, search

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 

Notable?

Given that two of the instances are actually the same thing, and that there's nothing really tying them together, i think this isn't really worth its own page. — Defender1031*Talk 16:49, 1 January 2009 (UTC)

It isn't. Omnisweater 02:56, 4 January 2009 (UTC)
I too call for a delete. The aforementioned reference may have pre-dated the On Point Kings, hence I say that the date email indirectly inspired that, but as stated, the actual quotation is too infrequent to have its own article (not to mention its godawful grammar from the original poster). Rexy-mberween (save the rabbits!) 17:01, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
This needs to be Deleted. This "running gag" has only two references.--Record307 11:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC)

Second.Hey,I want STUFF to come back.

Since there is only two appearances, I think there is no need for this article. Delete. Homestar-Winner (talk) 22:50, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

Baleet! Delteat! Del Taco? Bubs! Not a running gag. --Fangoriously! Chat 00:24, 22 February 2009 (UTC)

Two is not enough. Time to delete. – The Chort 19:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
It seems that the DVD Menu was just referencing the email, instead of trying to start a running gag. Otherwise, we would have seen it be implemented more then two times. DELORTED! Sbmaniac 23:20, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

People are too caught up in the "Three times" thing. It's not a hard-and-fast rule, it's a guideline. We should also look at the significance of a page on a case by case basis. That being said, I'm kinda finding it hard to justify the notability of this page, unless we can tie it more closely to the On Point Kings, or something like that. Have there been other instances of people being "On Point"? -132.183.138.34 01:11, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Strong_Bad_is_on_Point"