Category talk:Character Evolution
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Some bug.) |
ACupOfCoffee (Talk | contribs) (→Some bug.) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
Whoa, that just happened to me when I rid the redirect (further up)! -[[User:FaceCrap|FaceCrap]] 00:54, 1 February 2006 (UTC) | Whoa, that just happened to me when I rid the redirect (further up)! -[[User:FaceCrap|FaceCrap]] 00:54, 1 February 2006 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | :I'm not sure this is a bug, but there's definitely something wrong. [[User:Tom|Tom]] should be able to figure out what's going on. {{User:ACupOfCoffee/sig}} 01:01, 1 February 2006 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:01, 1 February 2006
Takedown
So, why'd we take the real evolution page down? What was wrong with it? Just wondering. -FaceCrap 14:38, 27 December 2005 (UTC)
Please? -FaceCrap 16:08, 22 January 2006 (UTC)
- My guess is, someone thought of it as redundant. I do not see discussion on it though. --Stux 01:44, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
- You don't see discussion on it because the discussion took place on the talk page for Character Evolution, which was deleted along with its talk page before it was a redirect (my fault). It was deleted because it consisted of nothing but a list of links to the character evolution pages, exactly like this page but requiring manual updating. If someone has an idea for how a Character Evolution page could include better content not included on this page, we could reinstate it. Homestar Coder 01:52, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
So, will we be putting the page back or not? -FaceCrap 00:51, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
Some bug.
Hey this must be some bug, but when I go here and it redirects me back to this category, the articles in the category do not appear! Just the text for the page itself. I was thinking of placing a notice like:
- If you do not see the category articles, please click here.
Or something like it. --Stux 01:43, 24 January 2006 (UTC)
Whoa, that just happened to me when I rid the redirect (further up)! -FaceCrap 00:54, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
- I'm not sure this is a bug, but there's definitely something wrong. Tom should be able to figure out what's going on. — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 01:01, 1 February 2006 (UTC)