Talk:Strong Bad Email By Title

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Revision as of 17:57, 27 March 2006 by It's dot com (Talk | contribs)
(diff) ← Older revision | Current revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to: navigation, search

Hi guys, I have created the Strong Bad Email list by title using an Excel Spreadsheet following the format of this page. The only thing it doesn't have is that they are not separated by each letter, I will let someone else do it. --Stux 17:09, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

Actually, I did this thing cuz the page was listed as a stub, and it seemed it was short, but the list may be complete, can anybody verify? If it is, then this page should not be listed as a stub (once it has a short intro I guess). --Stux 17:11, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
It was originally listed as a stub because I just pasted a (complete) list with no formatting. Since then, it has been made to look a little nicer, but there's currently still no intro or category or anything. — It's dot com 17:20, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Scope

Why are we adding "Lookin At A Thing In A Bag"? "Puppet Time"? How are these even remotely Sbemails? Qermaq - (T/C) Image:Qermaqsigpic.png 17:37, 27 March 2006 (UTC)

I added them cuz they are listed here as NQSBe's. --Stux 17:41, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
Ok, I see, but should they be? Qermaq - (T/C) Image:Qermaqsigpic.png 17:43, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
I think DVD sbemails and the like are okay, but Not Quite Strong Bad Emails are not quite Strong Bad Emails, and therefore shouldn't be in the list. — It's dot com 17:45, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
I agree. Trey56 17:47, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
EDC: Done. I am somewhat ambivalent towards NQSB's, (though I think many are "almost SBE's"), so I rv'd. I think I am personifying abbrev. overload. --Stux 17:47, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
Sick Day and Sbemail 150?!? could possibly go in the list, since they follow the format and parody real emails. — It's dot com 17:57, 27 March 2006 (UTC)
Personal tools