Template talk:delete
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I second that suggestion -- but then what consititutes a speedy delortion page? Also, trolls could pepper pages with "to be speedy deleted" tags all over... So, on second thought... I don't see that much benefit, egh. Suggestions? --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 16:22, 22 October 2005 (UTC) | :I second that suggestion -- but then what consititutes a speedy delortion page? Also, trolls could pepper pages with "to be speedy deleted" tags all over... So, on second thought... I don't see that much benefit, egh. Suggestions? --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 16:22, 22 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
::The template Gafaddict mentions was already created, put up for deletion, and removed with consensus.[[User:Tom|<nowiki></nowiki>]] -- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 00:28, 23 October 2005 (UTC) | ::The template Gafaddict mentions was already created, put up for deletion, and removed with consensus.[[User:Tom|<nowiki></nowiki>]] -- [[User:Tom|Tom]] 00:28, 23 October 2005 (UTC) | ||
| - | ::I agree with [[User:Gafaddict|Gafaddict]]. It would definately speed up the process of deleting pages for non-admins and non-sysops. | + | ::I agree with [[User:Gafaddict|Gafaddict]]. It would definately speed up the process of deleting pages for non-admins and non-sysops. {{User:Supuhstar/sig}} |
Revision as of 15:33, 17 March 2007
I'm thinking that we should create a sub category for candiates for speedy deletion. That way, it's easier for ops to sort out the pages that need speedy deletion. Approval? —Gafaddict 
(Talk | Contribs.) 04:07, 24 Aug 2005 (UTC)
- I second that suggestion -- but then what consititutes a speedy delortion page? Also, trolls could pepper pages with "to be speedy deleted" tags all over... So, on second thought... I don't see that much benefit, egh. Suggestions? --Stux 16:22, 22 October 2005 (UTC)
.gif){kind=small}
