Talk:H*R.com updates 2000

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Here's how I figure the main page 7 was the date I put it at.

1. Obviously it's Halloween themed. Even the Halloween Intro for the site directs you to it. It's most likely added that day.
2. It predates Main Page 9. This one uses the old Homestar Runner design. Most likely they updated the looks of all the Homestars when they changed his look, skipping that one because it's a somewhat harder fix.
3. The Yellow Dello is shown in Main Page 8. Most likely it was referencing The Search for the Yellow Dellow, and likely came out in the same vicinity of time. Which was 2000.

This isn't certain. But it's likely. In which case, it puts Main Page 12 likely in 2001. ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 21:58, 23 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Date site started

Is the date for "Homestarrunner.com started" the date the domain was registered, or the date content was put on it? I ask bbecause whois has the domain as being registered on Dec. 6, 1999. — User:ACupOfCoffee@ 05:53, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

It's commonly held that the starting point of content was January 1st, 2000, as revealed by The Brothers Chaps' in intervews here and here, here, here, here, here, and here. But I am gonna change the page a bit to denote what you've found. ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 06:09, 20 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Move?

Propose move to H*R.com updates 1996-2000 reflecting scope of content on page. H*R can refer to more than the website, indeed to the phenomenon that began in July/August 1996. - Qermaq - (^T/C)  02:37, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

Agree with move. Stuff like the store, interviews, and other stuff is listed on other pages, so... there you go. --DorianGray

Wait, are you suggesting moving all of the articles to "H*R updates 200X", or just this page to "H*R.com updates 1996-2000"? Moving to "H*R updates 200X" is a big change involving several articles. I could see how you'd want to move this to 1996-2000, but the other option would be just to create a new article called "H*R.com updates 1990s" or something. Though that still doesn't solve the ".com" problem, especially since 1990's updates don't even involve dot com. I just don't want to see any rash movings just yet, since it's a big job to change everything (epecially the links to H*R.com updates 2006). Personally, I don't see a big need for a move, but I'm open to alternate page titles, since I agree this isn't the best title at current to reflect the scope of these articles. ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 19:19, 26 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Move? (Again)

Three years later, this page still hasn't been moved. Should it, and if so, what to? free 21:41, 16 July 2009 (UTC)