Talk:Irregular Loading Screens

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Jump to: navigation, search

Hmm, I think we can think of a better name than Irregular Loading Screens. Irregular sounds like a glithched loading screen. Perhaps Customized loading screens? Rogue Leader / (my talk) 19:20, 11 November 2005 (UTC)

I don't really like Customised either. ...Unusual, perhaps? --DorianGray
Different? — Lapper (talk) 13:29, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

I think it should be called "Not Normal Loading Screens". Just a suggestion. HAJ 20:18, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] sberregular loading scremails

Aren't there some emails that lack a loadaling screen? I think they were in the Tandy era. DEI DAT VMdatvm center\super contra

No, Your mistaken. The Tandy has a loading screen. We just probably have fast browsers and flash players that load the email fast that we can't see it. All three of the computers have a personal loading screen using their font. All in all, there were some emails but we would have to look through all of them to check. If anybody's willing to do it?- User:Record307
They all had loading screens, each said "Loading". User:SBE-mail Checker Dan

[edit] These ones

Do these ones count as irregular?

hegtcX1.png Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 19:05, 2 July 2015 (UTC)

[edit] Load

Considering "Load" seems to have replaced "Loading" as the standard, I wouldn't call it "irregular". RickTommy (edits) 13:10, 30 May 2018 (UTC)

Considering the most recent toon's loading screen read "Loading...", I wouldn't call it "replaced". — Defender1031*Talk 17:00, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
It's clearly still a minority among toons either way. --DorianGray 17:33, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Plus, if every instance is listed and uploaded, we might as well keep them there. They're not hurting anyone. (It's also notable that you just removed almost half the information from a page without consensus, despite reverting multiple five-minute minor cleanups because there was no consensus.) hegtcX1.png Gfdgsgxgzgdrc 22:40, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Invalid comparison. One, those aren't related to changes in standard. Two, 'least I'm discussing it. Three, you have a habit of making (or wanting to make) major (no, those were not minor in the slightest) changes when not one single other user has had an issue in 10+ years of existence. And when the Wiki has a hundredth of the userbase it had in its height of popularity, no less. And four, here's another article that has had instances removed due to changes in standard. RickTommy (edits) 08:30, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Personal tools