Talk:Police
From Homestar Runner Wiki
[edit] Deletion Discussion
Umm, an article about something that DOESN'T appear? this is a new one... Delete — Defender1031*Talk 21:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Well, unless you count Lack of Visible Arms... =3 But yeah. This is essentially covered by the second paragraph on Free Country, USA#Politics. --DorianGray 21:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, an article about the lack of something is not always a bad idea. It's not a bad effort for a new user! But I agree with DorianGray: this has already been covered elsewhere. Not sure if we should delete this or redirect it. Loafing
22:00, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect it where? Lack of visible policemen? Seriously... — Defender1031*Talk 22:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
Redirect to Free Country, USA#Politics seems like a viable alternative.--Stux 22:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC)- I dunno. I think we could expand this a bit if we mention all of the instances people talked about police despite there never being any. Right now I think we should keep it. Homestar-Winner (talk) 01:16, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect. Bad Bad Guy 01:44, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep This might be an interesting article, since it does add something not available from the redirect (namely, all the instances where police are implied to occur in FCUSA), but I can also see the arguments for redirect. wbwolf (t | ed) 01:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- BBG, would you mind giving a reason why you think we should redirect it? Homestar-Winner (talk) 01:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- It's already covered on the Free Country article. Bad Bad Guy 02:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep please dont delete this page. i made it and love it very much.--Wichesbrew82 02:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- It's already covered on the Free Country article. Bad Bad Guy 02:06, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- BBG, would you mind giving a reason why you think we should redirect it? Homestar-Winner (talk) 01:57, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Weak keep This might be an interesting article, since it does add something not available from the redirect (namely, all the instances where police are implied to occur in FCUSA), but I can also see the arguments for redirect. wbwolf (t | ed) 01:47, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect. Bad Bad Guy 01:44, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- I dunno. I think we could expand this a bit if we mention all of the instances people talked about police despite there never being any. Right now I think we should keep it. Homestar-Winner (talk) 01:16, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect it where? Lack of visible policemen? Seriously... — Defender1031*Talk 22:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, an article about the lack of something is not always a bad idea. It's not a bad effort for a new user! But I agree with DorianGray: this has already been covered elsewhere. Not sure if we should delete this or redirect it. Loafing
This article is starting to take some shape of its own. After searching the wiki for instances of this word, it looks like more information about the subject can be added. --Stux 03:04, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
It has enough appearances to validate it. Awexome 00:03, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
- I agree that we should redirect it. Slipknot6477 15:28, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
- This discussion has been mostly dormant for about a month with no real progress, and based on both arguments and numbers, it would appear that there is no consensus to delete or redirect this. Heimstern Läufer
22:28, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
- This discussion has been mostly dormant for about a month with no real progress, and based on both arguments and numbers, it would appear that there is no consensus to delete or redirect this. Heimstern Läufer
