Talk:Rejects
From Homestar Runner Wiki
Contents |
[edit] Proposed Conditions of Rejection
A character, place, or object is a Reject if and only if X or more of the below conditions are met:
- It does not have any lines or important role in any toon
- It appears in only one toon
- It is only mentioned or appears in passing
- No character interacts with it
The above is only a guidline; it is up to the community as a whole to come to a decision regarding this. Please don't change this list or the "X" -- It has been left ambiguous on purpose; instead, comment below.
[edit] Evolution of things in H*R
Proposed classification system:
- One reference
Reject
- Two to three references
Inside Joke
- Four or more references
Becomes a Character/Place/Item
Thoughts/ideas?:-Drhaggis 20:04, 17 Sep 2004 (MST)
[edit] Reformatting
Whoever fixed the formatting on the Rejects page deserves a trophy. I looked at it earlier, and eek, what a mess. --TheNintenGenius 10:46, 16 Sep 2004 (MST)
It was I who reformatted the rejects. All I did was use wordpad to replace all the *(('s with [['s and the ))'s with ]]<br>'s. A few other minor changes but that was pretty much it. --Hobo 17:38, 18 Sep 2004 (MST)
Table has now been added to shorten this page up, similar to what's on the SBEmail page. Render
And it was I who uploaded the page from the old H*R wiki. And I have nothing to do with the crappy formatting. Homsar999 14:24, 21 Sep 2004 (CST)
[edit] Categorize?
Should Rejects be a category? Inside Jokes is. ~Hobo
[edit] Character, The
If someone has the time, I'd like to see all of the Rejects whose names end in ", the" to be fixed so that they're the right way around, e.g. "Lightswitch, The" needs to be changed to "The Lightswitch". That means moving the page with with the old name to a page with the new name, and fixing all links that point to it. The "Name-comma-The" system is not useful. -- InterruptorJones 13:24, 23 Sep 2004 (MST)
[edit] Objects
If there are rejected objects- shouldn't there be a normal objects page
[edit] Down with Rejects
I have given it much thought, and I think we should do away with rejects. Something either IS or IS NOT.
If it is "rejected", we move any relevant info to another page and delete the article until the thing in question gets more exposure. - [[User:Drhaggis|Dr Haggis]] 13:23, 25 Nov 2004 (MST)
I'd definately say it's time for a cleanup. --ninja pirate 17:56, 2 Dec 2004 (MST)
