Talk:Pining

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(wrong conjunction)
Line 2: Line 2:
O.K, why did someone nominate this article for deletion? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}}
O.K, why did someone nominate this article for deletion? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}}
-
:I don't see a running gag here. The [[TROGDOR!]] instance was a direct reference to [[trevor the vampire]], and the [[your funeral]] instance seems wholly unrelated. In other words, I think TBC are just using English words the way they're meant to be used. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 23:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
+
:I don't see a running gag here. The [[TROGDOR!]] instance was a direct reference to [[trevor the vampire]], but the [[your funeral]] instance seems wholly unrelated. In other words, I think TBC are just using English words the way they're meant to be used. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 23:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
::Don't delete my sentence DOT COM! And by the way, if it's not a running gag, then what is it? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}}
::Don't delete my sentence DOT COM! And by the way, if it's not a running gag, then what is it? {{User:Sam the Man/sig}}
:::Your comments were removed in an edit conflict. When I noticed that they had no purpose on the page, and shouldn't have been posted, I chose not to resolve the conflict. I'm saying this page is ''not'' a running gag and therefore should not have its own page. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 23:12, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
:::Your comments were removed in an edit conflict. When I noticed that they had no purpose on the page, and shouldn't have been posted, I chose not to resolve the conflict. I'm saying this page is ''not'' a running gag and therefore should not have its own page. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 23:12, 6 April 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:16, 6 April 2007

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 


O.K, why did someone nominate this article for deletion? User talk:Sam the Man Sam the Man

I don't see a running gag here. The TROGDOR! instance was a direct reference to trevor the vampire, but the your funeral instance seems wholly unrelated. In other words, I think TBC are just using English words the way they're meant to be used. — It's dot com 23:06, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Don't delete my sentence DOT COM! And by the way, if it's not a running gag, then what is it? User talk:Sam the Man Sam the Man
Your comments were removed in an edit conflict. When I noticed that they had no purpose on the page, and shouldn't have been posted, I chose not to resolve the conflict. I'm saying this page is not a running gag and therefore should not have its own page. — It's dot com 23:12, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Yeah, it depends on that third appearance. The first two are definitely connected, but I'm not so sure the third one is. Since three is the magic number for a running gag getting its own page, we'd have to get consensus that the your funeral appearance is a play off of trevor the vampire. Trey56 23:13, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
Ohhh, there right. Sorry Drippingyellowmadness, but there right. User talk:Sam the Man Sam the Man
Retrieved from "http://hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Pining"
Personal tools