Talk:Damp Towel Man
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
Defender1031 (Talk | contribs) (→What to do?: replor) |
(→What to do?: reword) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:I guess a big ol' compilation page would do it. So yeah, '''Strong Badman Characters'''. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 20:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC) | :I guess a big ol' compilation page would do it. So yeah, '''Strong Badman Characters'''. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 20:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
::Hmm... I can go for that. Yeah, yeah, I see it now... Big ol' compliation page. Table, of course. Images down the left-most column... Without all those character pages, though, would we still need [[:Category:Strong Badman]]? --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 20:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC) | ::Hmm... I can go for that. Yeah, yeah, I see it now... Big ol' compliation page. Table, of course. Images down the left-most column... Without all those character pages, though, would we still need [[:Category:Strong Badman]]? --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 20:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| - | ::: | + | :::<s>es, if we do it this way: We place the "Main article found here: [[I LOVE LINKS!]]" think for Strong Badman (maybe Stiny), and we'd already have the two location articles in the category, with a healthy subcategory (NOTE: I don't know the current health of said subcategory; just wanted to use an adjective).</s> {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 22:49, 21 May 2007 (UTC) |
::::Umm, was your head attached to your body when you wrote that? I seriously have no idea what you meant, and i read it through like 4 times. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC) | ::::Umm, was your head attached to your body when you wrote that? I seriously have no idea what you meant, and i read it through like 4 times. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
:::::Did you read DorianGray's question? "Without all those character pages, though, would we still need [[:Category:Strong Badman]]?" {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 22:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC) | :::::Did you read DorianGray's question? "Without all those character pages, though, would we still need [[:Category:Strong Badman]]?" {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 22:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
::::::Yes I did. it didn't help. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC) | ::::::Yes I did. it didn't help. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::::::Allow me to reword it. | ||
| + | |||
| + | :::::::We'd still have the category [[:Category:Strong Badman]], if we do it this way: We include all characters, and in Strong Badman's (and maybe Stiny's) section we place "See main article: [[Strong Badman]]" or "See main article: [[Stiny]]" and a brief description. That way, we'd have the Strong Badman article, Stiny's article (maybe), the two location articles already in the category, and the subcategory, [[:Category:Strong Badman Filmography]]. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 23:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 23:03, 21 May 2007
What to do?
Merge it, either with Coach Z or Strong Badman. --Jay (Gobble) 01:53, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Merge with Strong Badman. Loafing
01:59, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
Merge (I don't know which one to merge it with though). Homestar-Winner (talk) 02:06, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- MERGE? Okay, I completely disagree. I think we should really just MENTION it. I mean, first off, this is written like fanstuff. Or something else very unencyclopedic. I think a simple "According to Coach Z, he is the "legendary" Damp Towel Man, who collects damp towels from across the universe. However, this is probably just a joke, and not canon." I vote mention, and I don't even know or care if that's an option. Bluebry 04:17, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- I agree... this and Dry Ragamuffin probably deserve a sentence or two in Strong Badman, and possibly a sentence in Coach Z, but nothing more. --phlip TC 04:23, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Leave as is. All the other Strong Badman characters have their own pages, and have nearly the same amount of info. --DorianGray 04:45, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Agree'd with DorianGray. This page needs a rewrite though. Homestar Coder
05:16, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Serious rewrite... (When I wrote "leave as is", I hadn't actually looked at the page yet...) --DorianGray 05:18, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- I Don't Know Why The Guy Who Made This Article Chose To Capitalize Every Single Word In It. That's Really Silly. *ahem* Sorry. I think we should at least merge part of this article with the Coach Z one. Although, it's already mentioned in Alter Egos...hmm. Jimmy91 10:54, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- If this gets merged, so should Stiny, Grossman, Deutschman and The Deutsch Master. So No Merge.
Sam the Man
23:10, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- no merge for the reasons already stated. DeFender1031 23:12, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- If this gets merged, so should Stiny, Grossman, Deutschman and The Deutsch Master. So No Merge.
- I Don't Know Why The Guy Who Made This Article Chose To Capitalize Every Single Word In It. That's Really Silly. *ahem* Sorry. I think we should at least merge part of this article with the Coach Z one. Although, it's already mentioned in Alter Egos...hmm. Jimmy91 10:54, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Serious rewrite... (When I wrote "leave as is", I hadn't actually looked at the page yet...) --DorianGray 05:18, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- Agree'd with DorianGray. This page needs a rewrite though. Homestar Coder
- Leave as is. All the other Strong Badman characters have their own pages, and have nearly the same amount of info. --DorianGray 04:45, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- I agree... this and Dry Ragamuffin probably deserve a sentence or two in Strong Badman, and possibly a sentence in Coach Z, but nothing more. --phlip TC 04:23, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
- MERGE? Okay, I completely disagree. I think we should really just MENTION it. I mean, first off, this is written like fanstuff. Or something else very unencyclopedic. I think a simple "According to Coach Z, he is the "legendary" Damp Towel Man, who collects damp towels from across the universe. However, this is probably just a joke, and not canon." I vote mention, and I don't even know or care if that's an option. Bluebry 04:17, 19 May 2007 (UTC)
I feel the Strong Badman villains should get their own spotlight, and i don't mind separate pages, including this one (keep), but how about a page called Strong Badman Villains merging all of them there? Just throwing idea around. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 15:41, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- But damp towelman isn't a villian, he's a good guy. Dry ragamuffin would belong there but not this. DeFender1031 15:46, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- So how about Strong Badman Characters so we can include Stainy. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 15:48, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with E.L. Cool, we should do a separate pago for StrongBadman's characters, but if that can't be done/made/be an option, then MERGE with Coach Z. --Darkangel
17:56, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- I agree with E.L. Cool, we should do a separate pago for StrongBadman's characters, but if that can't be done/made/be an option, then MERGE with Coach Z. --Darkangel
- So how about Strong Badman Characters so we can include Stainy. — Elcool (talk)(contribs) 15:48, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
I agree with EL Cool, in saying that there should be a page for the Strong Badman villans, and the SBM "heroes", if they can even be called that. --
Jangles5150
19:15, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- I guess a big ol' compilation page would do it. So yeah, Strong Badman Characters. Bluebry 20:26, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm... I can go for that. Yeah, yeah, I see it now... Big ol' compliation page. Table, of course. Images down the left-most column... Without all those character pages, though, would we still need Category:Strong Badman? --DorianGray 20:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
es, if we do it this way: We place the "Main article found here: I LOVE LINKS!" think for Strong Badman (maybe Stiny), and we'd already have the two location articles in the category, with a healthy subcategory (NOTE: I don't know the current health of said subcategory; just wanted to use an adjective).Bluebry 22:49, 21 May 2007 (UTC)- Umm, was your head attached to your body when you wrote that? I seriously have no idea what you meant, and i read it through like 4 times. — Defender1031*Talk 22:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Did you read DorianGray's question? "Without all those character pages, though, would we still need Category:Strong Badman?" Bluebry 22:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Yes I did. it didn't help. — Defender1031*Talk 22:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Allow me to reword it.
- Yes I did. it didn't help. — Defender1031*Talk 22:58, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Did you read DorianGray's question? "Without all those character pages, though, would we still need Category:Strong Badman?" Bluebry 22:56, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Umm, was your head attached to your body when you wrote that? I seriously have no idea what you meant, and i read it through like 4 times. — Defender1031*Talk 22:53, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
- Hmm... I can go for that. Yeah, yeah, I see it now... Big ol' compliation page. Table, of course. Images down the left-most column... Without all those character pages, though, would we still need Category:Strong Badman? --DorianGray 20:30, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
- We'd still have the category Category:Strong Badman, if we do it this way: We include all characters, and in Strong Badman's (and maybe Stiny's) section we place "See main article: Strong Badman" or "See main article: Stiny" and a brief description. That way, we'd have the Strong Badman article, Stiny's article (maybe), the two location articles already in the category, and the subcategory, Category:Strong Badman Filmography. Bluebry 23:03, 21 May 2007 (UTC)
