Talk:Inkhole Interview

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
m (reply)
(Sorry: reply for all)
 
(includes 14 intermediate revisions)
Line 2: Line 2:
:The creator of this article ([[User:209.221.140.59|209.221.140.59]]) noted that this is from www.archive.org.  --[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 00:47, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
:The creator of this article ([[User:209.221.140.59|209.221.140.59]]) noted that this is from www.archive.org.  --[[User:BazookaJoe|BazookaJoe]] 00:47, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
::I think it's pretty safe to leave this one too... {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 03:49, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
I still think we need permission to reprint from the author. Dats da rulz [[User:Drhaggis|<nowiki></nowiki>]]- [[User:Drhaggis|Dr Haggis]] - [[User talk: Drhaggis|Talk]] 15:27, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
Yes, I agree. It's not really a good idea to have this uncopyrighted stuff here.--[[User:Darklinkskywalker|Darklinkskywalker]] 02:02, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
:well we need to come to some kind of decision. I really think just leave well enough alone. {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 06:20, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
::See [[Club_Aquatica_Interview_-_29_Oct_2003]], I modeled the changes I made after that.  Unfortunately the link is broken and a mirror would be great! --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 16:52, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 +
:::I found them [http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.theinkhole.com/homestar1.htm here]. But the pictures contain errors. I'm posting it [http://web.archive.org/web/*/http://www.theinkhole.com/ anyway]. I will let someone else decide if it's up to code. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 16:55, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Clean up ==
 +
 +
Ok, so could someone help me out with this? I don't exactly see ''why'' this needs to be cleaned up, but atleast, ''how'' would we clean it up? {{User:Homestramy20/sig}} 23:45, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
 +
 +
== Sorry ==
 +
 +
I'm sorry I accidently censored this thing. I was READiNG the censored version when instead of clicking edit I hit the link to the other one. My computer sucks. So I tried clicking edit again and it worked, but I edited the wrong article. [[User:Randomnerd10|Randomnerd10]] 00:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 +
:Lol, no probalo! This is actually not a problem on your end. That's how it works, since the uncensored version is included and automatically censored. You can't manually censor a word like "damn", that would have to be done by the admins by adding the word to the list of automatically censored words.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 00:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 +
::No problem. I always (Or Most Likely) make a mistake when I edit. So no harsh feelings, I see you want to make this wiki safe.  {{User:Sam the Man/sig}} 00:48, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
 +
:::That's not quite how it works, Loafi... what you do, is replace it with <code>{&#123;{swear|</code>''naughty word here''<code>}}}</code> &ndash; then it'll display the naughty word on this page, but on the censored version, some MediaWiki template magic will turn it into ***. That said, I don't think "damn" is strong enough a swear to censor... but I'm open to the community opinion. As for the edit... Clicking the "edit" tab at the top on the censored version will give {{pl|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Inkhole_Interview_%28censored%29&action=edit a thoroughly uninteresting page}}... but clicking the "[edit]" section links will give you the edit page for that section in the uncensored version. 99% of the time, that's the right thing to do... it just got confusing here. {{User:Phlip/sig}} 03:13, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Current revision as of 03:13, 15 July 2007

This article needs copyright info from the writter, else it will be deleted.- Dr Haggis - Talk 00:44, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The creator of this article (209.221.140.59) noted that this is from www.archive.org. --BazookaJoe 00:47, 10 Jun 2005 (UTC)
I think it's pretty safe to leave this one too... Thunderbird 03:49, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I still think we need permission to reprint from the author. Dats da rulz - Dr Haggis - Talk 15:27, 11 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Yes, I agree. It's not really a good idea to have this uncopyrighted stuff here.--Darklinkskywalker 02:02, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)

well we need to come to some kind of decision. I really think just leave well enough alone. Thunderbird 06:20, 23 Sep 2005 (UTC)
See Club_Aquatica_Interview_-_29_Oct_2003, I modeled the changes I made after that. Unfortunately the link is broken and a mirror would be great! --Stux 16:52, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)
I found them here. But the pictures contain errors. I'm posting it anyway. I will let someone else decide if it's up to code. --Stux 16:55, 1 Oct 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Clean up

Ok, so could someone help me out with this? I don't exactly see why this needs to be cleaned up, but atleast, how would we clean it up? Homestramy20|Talk 23:45, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Sorry

I'm sorry I accidently censored this thing. I was READiNG the censored version when instead of clicking edit I hit the link to the other one. My computer sucks. So I tried clicking edit again and it worked, but I edited the wrong article. Randomnerd10 00:46, 15 July 2007 (UTC)

Lol, no probalo! This is actually not a problem on your end. That's how it works, since the uncensored version is included and automatically censored. You can't manually censor a word like "damn", that would have to be done by the admins by adding the word to the list of automatically censored words. Loafing 00:52, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
No problem. I always (Or Most Likely) make a mistake when I edit. So no harsh feelings, I see you want to make this wiki safe. User talk:Sam the Man Sam the Man 00:48, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
That's not quite how it works, Loafi... what you do, is replace it with {{{swear|naughty word here}}} – then it'll display the naughty word on this page, but on the censored version, some MediaWiki template magic will turn it into ***. That said, I don't think "damn" is strong enough a swear to censor... but I'm open to the community opinion. As for the edit... Clicking the "edit" tab at the top on the censored version will give a thoroughly uninteresting page... but clicking the "[edit]" section links will give you the edit page for that section in the uncensored version. 99% of the time, that's the right thing to do... it just got confusing here. --phlip TC 03:13, 15 July 2007 (UTC)
Personal tools