Talk:C'mon! It's FOG!
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(Always read [HRWiki:Inclusion guidelines]] before TBDing.) |
|||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
:::::Items do not need multiple appearances to merit articles. This article is fine as is and even helps to bring out an easily-missed element of the toon. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:04, 29 November 2008 (UTC) | :::::Items do not need multiple appearances to merit articles. This article is fine as is and even helps to bring out an easily-missed element of the toon. {{User:Heimstern Läufer/sig}} 03:04, 29 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
::::::For those who haven't already, it would be worth reading the discussions at [[Talk:Hamburger Shampoo]] and [[Talk:Fthoom-Bang]]. Also have a look at point 3 of the [[HRWiki:Inclusion guidelines]]. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 21:16, 10 December 2008 (UTC) | ::::::For those who haven't already, it would be worth reading the discussions at [[Talk:Hamburger Shampoo]] and [[Talk:Fthoom-Bang]]. Also have a look at point 3 of the [[HRWiki:Inclusion guidelines]]. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 21:16, 10 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::::::This article has only two sentences | ||
Revision as of 02:41, 7 July 2009
Really?
Umm....should this really merit its own page? I mean, it's only appeared once, why do it? - Opus the Penguin 16:37, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- It can really be summed up by this: "Some items are seen only once, but are particularly interesting."
ThePizz√ Pick 17:02, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- It's on screen for 21 frames (less than two seconds), and only during two of those frames is the full name visible. No real attention is drawn to it, and it is not "particularly interesting". This belongs in Remarks or Trivia in the bike thief article, maybe with an image. It does not deserve its own article.
OptimisticFool 19:00, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- So, maybe put it in the trivia section with a picture? - Opus the Penguin 19:08, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- Is there an echo in here? =] OptimisticFool 19:12, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- Items do not need multiple appearances to merit articles. This article is fine as is and even helps to bring out an easily-missed element of the toon. Heimstern Läufer
03:04, 29 November 2008 (UTC)
- For those who haven't already, it would be worth reading the discussions at Talk:Hamburger Shampoo and Talk:Fthoom-Bang. Also have a look at point 3 of the HRWiki:Inclusion guidelines. – The Chort 21:16, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
- This article has only two sentences
- For those who haven't already, it would be worth reading the discussions at Talk:Hamburger Shampoo and Talk:Fthoom-Bang. Also have a look at point 3 of the HRWiki:Inclusion guidelines. – The Chort 21:16, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
- Items do not need multiple appearances to merit articles. This article is fine as is and even helps to bring out an easily-missed element of the toon. Heimstern Läufer
- Is there an echo in here? =]
- So, maybe put it in the trivia section with a picture? - Opus the Penguin 19:08, 28 November 2008 (UTC)
- It's on screen for 21 frames (less than two seconds), and only during two of those frames is the full name visible. No real attention is drawn to it, and it is not "particularly interesting". This belongs in Remarks or Trivia in the bike thief article, maybe with an image. It does not deserve its own article.
