Talk:Fthoom-Bang

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Before anyone considers deleting this, there are plenty of things that only appeared once. --Jnelson09 19:52, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

This is too minor. Sam the Man

OK. Then I guess we'll have to do away with this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, and a lot of other things that have only had 1 or 2 appearances. ¤ The Mü _{Talk to me.} 20:12, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

The mu, i agree. None of those needs its own page. They would all do fine on the main items page. PS. Er, oops, sorry about that accidental revert.DeFender1031 20:11, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Oh, and also this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, and WAY more than that. ¤ The Mü _{Talk to me.} 20:22, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

The mu, all true. They should all go. DeFender1031 20:23, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Alright. Why don't you take it upon yourself to merge all of those into Items, if, that is, you really care? ¤ The Mü _{Talk to me.} 20:26, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

If that's the consensus reached on them, then i'd be happy to start on it tomorrow. DeFender1031 20:28, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

OK then. Also, don't forget, you'll have to do this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, this, and this. And then you'd be done. ¤ The Mü _{Talk to me.} 20:37, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Please stop the childish list-making and actually discuss the merits of this page in a mature way. Thanks. Yes, we have a lot of those pages, but their mere existence isn't necessarily a good reason to keep them. It could just be that our inclusion policy needs looking at as far as those pages go. Or perhaps not. That's what the discussion is for. But don't just throw an avalanche of "this this this" at the thread and expect it to count as a real point. — It's dot com 20:44, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

The Mu is right. There are already too many pages like that and it would take too long to revert them all. Homestar-Winner (talk) 20:46, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

I would be willing to remove them all if necessary. That's not within the scope of this discussion though. DeFender1031 20:48, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

This article has a lot of potential, though. For instance, we could note the patterns in the fireworks. ¤ The Mü _{Talk to me.} 20:53, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

I strongly disagree with the proposed merging of all the minor item pages that have been listed. It has been stated time and time again that page for one-appearance items are not bad. If we were to get rid of all those articles, the wiki would be stripped down to nothing more than a collection of toons and characters, which is not what it should be. Many of the articles listed contain interesting information that does not fit well on other pages. Articles are supposed to elaborate on the subject, and as long as there is something to elaborate on, why not create an article about Homestar's Daisy Dukes? This wiki is about documenting all aspects of Homestar Runner, and that includes minor items, as long as they have at least moderate importance to the plot. I don't want the wiki returning to the Merge Craze of Aught Five. Ive. — Has Matt? (talk) 21:18, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

{Sigh} Ok. I think for the millionth time: Items can have a page even if they appear for only one time and The three appearances law only regard running gags and inside jokes. Please read, re-read and read over again HRWiki:Inclusion guidelines. This is a referenced, used item with characters referencing it by name and have jokes related to it. — Elcool ^(talk)_(contribs) 22:12, 16 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks for reminding mw E.L Cool. No Merge or No Delort! Sam the Man 22:18, 16 May 2007 (UTC)