Talk:Humidibot

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(→Jumping the gun)
(→Jumping the gun: precedent)
Line 3: Line 3:
He's only appeared once, as a one-off joke. In addition, when the idea of giving him his own page was [[Talk:Fan Costumes 2015#ENTER HUMIDIBOT!|discussed]], that seemed to be the consensus. Then all of a sudden, a somewhat rude anonny shows up and {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fan_Costumes_2015&diff=next&oldid=753461 demands}} a page, and we suddenly create a {{p|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Humidibot&diff=753469&oldid=753356 "Badly rushed and badly written" article}} for no reason? This does not make much sense to me. I would suggest removing this until and unless humie makes another appearance. Also note that [[F-Sack]] didn't get a page until he reappeared a couple of times too. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 06:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
He's only appeared once, as a one-off joke. In addition, when the idea of giving him his own page was [[Talk:Fan Costumes 2015#ENTER HUMIDIBOT!|discussed]], that seemed to be the consensus. Then all of a sudden, a somewhat rude anonny shows up and {{p|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Fan_Costumes_2015&diff=next&oldid=753461 demands}} a page, and we suddenly create a {{p|l=http://hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Humidibot&diff=753469&oldid=753356 "Badly rushed and badly written" article}} for no reason? This does not make much sense to me. I would suggest removing this until and unless humie makes another appearance. Also note that [[F-Sack]] didn't get a page until he reappeared a couple of times too. {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 06:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
:(I'm not that anonny).  I think the humidibot had a big enough role to warrant a page.  We have pages for other one off things (for example, the steaky steaky - I'm sure there are others).  I don't think it's worthwhile to "wait until he has another appearance", as there's a good likelihood that he never will.[[Special:Contributions/76.19.199.237|76.19.199.237]] 13:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
:(I'm not that anonny).  I think the humidibot had a big enough role to warrant a page.  We have pages for other one off things (for example, the steaky steaky - I'm sure there are others).  I don't think it's worthwhile to "wait until he has another appearance", as there's a good likelihood that he never will.[[Special:Contributions/76.19.199.237|76.19.199.237]] 13:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
 +
::There are [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Homestar_Jr.&oldid=671190 plenty] of [http://www.hrwiki.org/w/index.php?title=Horrible_Painting&oldid=110064 other] [[The Denzel|pseudocharacters]] who either only have one appearance as of now or had pages back when they only had one appearance. Per precedent, I feel like this page more than qualifies as a pseudocharacter, considering he actually spoke. {{User:MichaelXX2/sig}} 18:46, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 18:46, 18 November 2015

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 

Jumping the gun

He's only appeared once, as a one-off joke. In addition, when the idea of giving him his own page was discussed, that seemed to be the consensus. Then all of a sudden, a somewhat rude anonny shows up and demands a page, and we suddenly create a "Badly rushed and badly written" article for no reason? This does not make much sense to me. I would suggest removing this until and unless humie makes another appearance. Also note that F-Sack didn't get a page until he reappeared a couple of times too. — Defender1031*Talk 06:32, 18 November 2015 (UTC)

(I'm not that anonny). I think the humidibot had a big enough role to warrant a page. We have pages for other one off things (for example, the steaky steaky - I'm sure there are others). I don't think it's worthwhile to "wait until he has another appearance", as there's a good likelihood that he never will.76.19.199.237 13:27, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
There are plenty of other pseudocharacters who either only have one appearance as of now or had pages back when they only had one appearance. Per precedent, I feel like this page more than qualifies as a pseudocharacter, considering he actually spoke. — MichaelXX2 mail_icon.gif link_icon.gif 18:46, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:Humidibot"
Personal tools