Talk:Lurker
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(redir) |
(We don't delete discussions anymore. For instance, just now, I wanted to find out why exactly this got merged. So I'm reverting.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| - | + | {{deletedtalk}} | |
| + | |||
| + | == Merge == | ||
| + | |||
| + | This should be merged with [[Strong Sad]] since nobody else is called a lurker. I also don't think it's significant enough to warrant it's own article.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 06:05, 12 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :All right, then. Go ahead. [[User:Retromaniac|Retromaniac]] 16:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::Even though thia topic's been dormant, I agree with merging the article with [[Strong Sad]]. I feel the information deserves to be a part of the wiki, but doesn't deserve its own page. {{User:Bluebry/sig}} 20:36, 30 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::Agree. '''Merge'''. {{User:Qermaq/sig}} 20:37, 30 December 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::Unless anyone has any immediate objections, perhaps we should merge it right now. — {{User:Lapper/sig}} 03:39, 4 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::::Looks likes solid consensus to me — I'm going to go ahead and merge it. {{User:Trey56/sig}} 18:34, 6 January 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 16:11, 2 November 2008
Merge
This should be merged with Strong Sad since nobody else is called a lurker. I also don't think it's significant enough to warrant it's own article. Loafing
06:05, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- All right, then. Go ahead. Retromaniac 16:33, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
- Even though thia topic's been dormant, I agree with merging the article with Strong Sad. I feel the information deserves to be a part of the wiki, but doesn't deserve its own page. Bluebry 20:36, 30 December 2006 (UTC)
