Talk:Nondescript Nouns
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(politeness) |
|||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I think it's a good idea, but you'd need to find at least three or four instances to warrant a page about such a "Nondescript Subject". {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 23:51, 13 January 2006 (UTC) | :I think it's a good idea, but you'd need to find at least three or four instances to warrant a page about such a "Nondescript Subject". {{User:Thunderbird L17/Siggie}} 23:51, 13 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
::Yeah, Seriously. I think you can be a bit more polite than that. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 23:52, 13 January 2006 (UTC) | ::Yeah, Seriously. I think you can be a bit more polite than that. {{User:Has Matt?/sig}} 23:52, 13 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::Unluckily, I have to agree with deleting it. It doesn't really help the wiki in Homestar information. [[User:Bluebry muffin|Bluebry muffin]] 14:10, 14 January 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 14:10, 14 January 2006
wow. i do not think i haved ever seen something so stupid. delete this garbage. Seriously 11:51, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- I think it's a good idea, but you'd need to find at least three or four instances to warrant a page about such a "Nondescript Subject". ⇔Thunderbird⇔ 23:51, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, Seriously. I think you can be a bit more polite than that. — Has Matt? (talk) 23:52, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
- Unluckily, I have to agree with deleting it. It doesn't really help the wiki in Homestar information. Bluebry muffin 14:10, 14 January 2006 (UTC)
- Yeah, Seriously. I think you can be a bit more polite than that. — Has Matt? (talk) 23:52, 13 January 2006 (UTC)
