User talk:Wiki grrl/Homestar vs. Homsar
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Deletion) |
|||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
:::Bluebry: I believe you are interpreting the user space guidelines too narrowly. First of all, this page has never been deleted. Second, it attempts to be encyclopedic in content. It could even be considered a work in progress, which is certainly allowed. I'm also not sure it "just as easily" fits on her user page, given that it is an article. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 00:47, 25 April 2006 (UTC) | :::Bluebry: I believe you are interpreting the user space guidelines too narrowly. First of all, this page has never been deleted. Second, it attempts to be encyclopedic in content. It could even be considered a work in progress, which is certainly allowed. I'm also not sure it "just as easily" fits on her user page, given that it is an article. — [[User:It's dot com|It's dot com]] 00:47, 25 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
::::I knew you would say that first one. Well, why do we need a subpage of it if it's an article? It has to be deleted or rejected as HRWiki content before we subpage it, or it'd just be a waste. That, and Wiki grrl's comment below of "delete it ASAP" and the number of people for the deletion of this article say that. 2: A work in progress means it will be released back into the wiki one day. If we have deleted it, we will probably delete it again, and if it REALLy needs work done to it, mark it with the cleanup tag. In fact, moving it to a subpage would be more of a hassle really unless we take the options above (as I see it, at least). Secondly, '''Do not use component (nested) pages for content that could just as easily go on your main page.''' HRWiki:User space said it, I repeated it, and I'm doin' it again. This is just fine where it is on Wiki grrl's User page. Also, may I ask the reason you ''must'' have this article as a subpage? My reason for all of these replies (or seilper, if you will) is to enforce the guidlines on [[HRWiki:User space]]. {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 00:55, 25 April 2006 (UTC) | ::::I knew you would say that first one. Well, why do we need a subpage of it if it's an article? It has to be deleted or rejected as HRWiki content before we subpage it, or it'd just be a waste. That, and Wiki grrl's comment below of "delete it ASAP" and the number of people for the deletion of this article say that. 2: A work in progress means it will be released back into the wiki one day. If we have deleted it, we will probably delete it again, and if it REALLy needs work done to it, mark it with the cleanup tag. In fact, moving it to a subpage would be more of a hassle really unless we take the options above (as I see it, at least). Secondly, '''Do not use component (nested) pages for content that could just as easily go on your main page.''' HRWiki:User space said it, I repeated it, and I'm doin' it again. This is just fine where it is on Wiki grrl's User page. Also, may I ask the reason you ''must'' have this article as a subpage? My reason for all of these replies (or seilper, if you will) is to enforce the guidlines on [[HRWiki:User space]]. {{User:Bluebry muffin/sig}} 00:55, 25 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
| + | I vote do not delete. Like It's Dot Com said, it is complety right! It is a nice project, and deserves to stay. Please keep it. New users who do not know a lot about the simalarities of the two can learn from this! KEEP IT! | ||
| + | ------Wiki grrl 00:59, 25 April 2006 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:59, 25 April 2006
Deletion
Personally, I think the contents of this article are obvious. I just don't think we need to note this on its own page. We also could move each thing to the characters' pages. Bluebry 23:13, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- I'm afraid Bluebry's right. I support deletion. Heimstern Läufer
23:14, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
I am the creator of this article. Could you please move the page to my user page as in "UserPages:Wiki grrl" or something?
- No, I believe it's against the subpage rules. (If you want it moves to something in your userspace, then you would use subpages.) Bluebry 23:22, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Wiki grrl, please don't take this vote personally. We all have spent hours on things which were eventually deleted. This is not a vote on you, or on how hard you worked on this page, but on the value of this page to the wiki. I'm afraid that my opinion is that while it is interesting, it's not needed, and that would be my opinion no matter who made it. Please don't let it discourage you from contributing to the wiki. - Qermaq - (T/C) 
23:34, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Agreed, Qermaq. I'm more subject to a deletion than a merge, here. ♥ teeeffoh! 23:35, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
Its okay. I consider your hard efforts to help the wiki as well as mine. I copied and pasted it to my user page. I will continue contributing to the wiki! Could you give me ideas for other articles?--Wiki grrl 23:37, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
- Move to user subpage. Why can't this be moved to her user space? I know she copied it to her user page, but what's wrong with a subpage? In my opinion this serves the project quite well. I believe we should encourage academic essays such as this in the user space. (Note that in no way would I want such essays to be fanstuff.) She has clearly tried to follow good form here, with an introduction, development paragraphs, and a conclusion. These things are to be commended. Good prize! — It's dot com 00:09, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- I do believe that it should be a user subpage, but, It is in the "guidelines". This is where it said archives of already deleted pages. I'm fine with it being a subpage, but it is against the user space guidelines. That, and it said Do not use component (nested) pages for content that could just as easily go on your main page. I'm pretty sure this is kinda like template and stuff like that, but, this can easily go on the User page. Sorry, Wiki grrl, it's not personal. Bluebry 00:15, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- Bluebry: I believe you are interpreting the user space guidelines too narrowly. First of all, this page has never been deleted. Second, it attempts to be encyclopedic in content. It could even be considered a work in progress, which is certainly allowed. I'm also not sure it "just as easily" fits on her user page, given that it is an article. — It's dot com 00:47, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- I knew you would say that first one. Well, why do we need a subpage of it if it's an article? It has to be deleted or rejected as HRWiki content before we subpage it, or it'd just be a waste. That, and Wiki grrl's comment below of "delete it ASAP" and the number of people for the deletion of this article say that. 2: A work in progress means it will be released back into the wiki one day. If we have deleted it, we will probably delete it again, and if it REALLy needs work done to it, mark it with the cleanup tag. In fact, moving it to a subpage would be more of a hassle really unless we take the options above (as I see it, at least). Secondly, Do not use component (nested) pages for content that could just as easily go on your main page. HRWiki:User space said it, I repeated it, and I'm doin' it again. This is just fine where it is on Wiki grrl's User page. Also, may I ask the reason you must have this article as a subpage? My reason for all of these replies (or seilper, if you will) is to enforce the guidlines on HRWiki:User space. Bluebry 00:55, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- Bluebry: I believe you are interpreting the user space guidelines too narrowly. First of all, this page has never been deleted. Second, it attempts to be encyclopedic in content. It could even be considered a work in progress, which is certainly allowed. I'm also not sure it "just as easily" fits on her user page, given that it is an article. — It's dot com 00:47, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
- I do believe that it should be a user subpage, but, It is in the "guidelines". This is where it said archives of already deleted pages. I'm fine with it being a subpage, but it is against the user space guidelines. That, and it said Do not use component (nested) pages for content that could just as easily go on your main page. I'm pretty sure this is kinda like template and stuff like that, but, this can easily go on the User page. Sorry, Wiki grrl, it's not personal. Bluebry 00:15, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
I vote do not delete. Like It's Dot Com said, it is complety right! It is a nice project, and deserves to stay. Please keep it. New users who do not know a lot about the simalarities of the two can learn from this! KEEP IT!
Wiki grrl 00:59, 25 April 2006 (UTC)
