Talk:Seriously
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(→Image Caption) |
m (→Image Caption: oops! fix typo) |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
== Image Caption == | == Image Caption == | ||
- | Regarding {{pl|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Seriously&curid=29327&diff=520869&oldid=520867&rcid=477561 this edit}} which stemmed from {{pl|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Seriously&diff=prev&oldid=520854 | + | Regarding {{pl|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Seriously&curid=29327&diff=520869&oldid=520867&rcid=477561 this edit}} which stemmed from {{pl|l=http://www.hrwiki.org/index.php?title=Seriously&diff=prev&oldid=520854 this edit}} and the one in the middle. The reason that the thumbnail caption was removed was because the image itself already contains a caption. Adding another caption in this case is rather redundant can take away from the fun of the actual image. It would be very hard, in my opinion, to find a very good caption and the current one I don't think is one. However, I did leave the "thumb" frame because I think it looks more wiki-like. Nevertheless, in order to avoid any kind of edit war, I have started this discussion here. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 17:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC) |
Revision as of 17:15, 25 November 2007
I just realized seriously is also written as sewiously sometimes in the transcripts too. So, don't forget to search those too... Ed lim smildE / talk
A lot of the Other appearances clearly have nothing to do with Homestar Runner's catch phrase. Should we remove them? --Trogga 00:27, 29 December 2006 (UTC)
- Anyone? --Trogga 20:15, 19 January 2007 (UTC)
- Nah, I don't think we need to, since they're divided up. It's like all the subdivisions in the Crap article. (Doesn't it sound funny to say that? Like, "this article is crap", but it's actually a good article. It's a play on words, or something.) They're not all Strongo Baddo's catchphrase. --DorianGray
Image Caption
Regarding this edit which stemmed from this edit and the one in the middle. The reason that the thumbnail caption was removed was because the image itself already contains a caption. Adding another caption in this case is rather redundant can take away from the fun of the actual image. It would be very hard, in my opinion, to find a very good caption and the current one I don't think is one. However, I did leave the "thumb" frame because I think it looks more wiki-like. Nevertheless, in order to avoid any kind of edit war, I have started this discussion here. --Stux 17:13, 25 November 2007 (UTC)