Talk:Police
From Homestar Runner Wiki
(Difference between revisions)
(→Deletion Discussion: wishy-washy) |
m (→Deletion Discussion: fix a spell) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
Umm, an article about something that DOESN'T appear? this is a new one... '''Delete''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | Umm, an article about something that DOESN'T appear? this is a new one... '''Delete''' {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 21:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Well, unless you count [[Lack of Visible Arms]]... =3 But yeah. This is essentially covered by the second paragraph on [[Free Country, USA#Politics]]. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 21:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | :Well, unless you count [[Lack of Visible Arms]]... =3 But yeah. This is essentially covered by the second paragraph on [[Free Country, USA#Politics]]. --[[User:DorianGray|DorianGray]] 21:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
- | ::Yeah, an article about the lack of something is not always a bad idea. It's not a bad effort for a new user! But I agree with DorianGray: this has already been covered elsewhere. | + | ::Yeah, an article about the lack of something is not always a bad idea. It's not a bad effort for a new user! But I agree with DorianGray: this has already been covered elsewhere. Not sure if we should delete this or redirect it.{{User:Loafing/sig}} 22:00, 17 February 2008 (UTC) |
:::Redirect it where? [[Lack of Visible Arms|Lack of visible policemen]]? Seriously... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | :::Redirect it where? [[Lack of Visible Arms|Lack of visible policemen]]? Seriously... {{User:DeFender1031/sig}} 22:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | ||
::::Redirect to [[Free Country, USA#Politics]] seems like a viable alternative. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 22:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC) | ::::Redirect to [[Free Country, USA#Politics]] seems like a viable alternative. --[[User:Stux|Stux]] 22:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:55, 20 February 2008
Deletion Discussion
Umm, an article about something that DOESN'T appear? this is a new one... Delete — Defender1031*Talk 21:49, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Well, unless you count Lack of Visible Arms... =3 But yeah. This is essentially covered by the second paragraph on Free Country, USA#Politics. --DorianGray 21:53, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, an article about the lack of something is not always a bad idea. It's not a bad effort for a new user! But I agree with DorianGray: this has already been covered elsewhere. Not sure if we should delete this or redirect it. Loafing
22:00, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect it where? Lack of visible policemen? Seriously... — Defender1031*Talk 22:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect to Free Country, USA#Politics seems like a viable alternative. --Stux 22:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- I dunno. I think we could expand this a bit if we mention all of the instances people talked about police despite there never being any. Right now I think we should keep it. Homestar-Winner (talk) 01:16, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect. Bad Bad Guy 01:44, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- I dunno. I think we could expand this a bit if we mention all of the instances people talked about police despite there never being any. Right now I think we should keep it. Homestar-Winner (talk) 01:16, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect to Free Country, USA#Politics seems like a viable alternative. --Stux 22:03, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Redirect it where? Lack of visible policemen? Seriously... — Defender1031*Talk 22:02, 17 February 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, an article about the lack of something is not always a bad idea. It's not a bad effort for a new user! But I agree with DorianGray: this has already been covered elsewhere. Not sure if we should delete this or redirect it. Loafing