Talk:MivaScript

From Homestar Runner Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(→Notability: possible merge location)
(MivaScript sounds like a Legend of Zelda character!)
Line 6: Line 6:
:::Nah, I vote for [[Site Components]]. {{User:ColdReactive/sig}} 23:28, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
:::Nah, I vote for [[Site Components]]. {{User:ColdReactive/sig}} 23:28, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
::::I think it would fit better on the [[Message Bored]] page, since it's directly related to the how that was run.  I don't think [[Site Components]] quite work, since that is simply a list and MivaScript is no longer an active part of the site. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 00:11, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
::::I think it would fit better on the [[Message Bored]] page, since it's directly related to the how that was run.  I don't think [[Site Components]] quite work, since that is simply a list and MivaScript is no longer an active part of the site. {{User:Wbwolf/sig}} 00:11, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
 +
:::::The real problem with this article is that most people (myself included) have no idea what this article is talking about. You can read the words, but they are completely meaningless to anyone who doesn't have extensive knowledge of scripting technology. This subject is really too niche to have an entire article, but a section on Message Board might be suitable. {{User:The Chort/sig}} 13:03, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 13:03, 2 September 2009

It has been suggested that the content of the page this talk page accompanies should not be a separate article on the wiki.

  • Please discuss below whether the content of the page should have its own article. Remember to consider ways the content could be brought up to the wiki's standards before making this determination.

If it is decided that the content should not have its own article, then the following additional issues need to be addressed:

  • Whether to merge the content with another page or remove it entirely.
  • Whether to redirect the leftover page or delete it outright.
 

Notability

While I do find it sort of interesting regarding a particular technology in relation to the website, do we really need a wiki page about it? It seems like it would fall outside of the scope of the purpose of this wiki, and might, in abbreviated form, might work better elsewhere? wbwolf (t | ed) 22:09, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

I don't think the content should be deleted, maybe moved or merged. ColdReactive 22:26, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
On Message Bored? —Soiled Bargains (talk|ctrb) 22:55, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
Nah, I vote for Site Components. ColdReactive 23:28, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
I think it would fit better on the Message Bored page, since it's directly related to the how that was run. I don't think Site Components quite work, since that is simply a list and MivaScript is no longer an active part of the site. wbwolf (t | ed) 00:11, 31 August 2009 (UTC)
The real problem with this article is that most people (myself included) have no idea what this article is talking about. You can read the words, but they are completely meaningless to anyone who doesn't have extensive knowledge of scripting technology. This subject is really too niche to have an entire article, but a section on Message Board might be suitable. – The Chort 13:03, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
Retrieved from "http://hrwiki.org/wiki/Talk:MivaScript"
Personal tools