Talk:Stinkoman

From Homestar Runner Wiki

Kepp it this way.--No Loafing 15:39, 28 Sep 2004 (MST) (except for screenshot)

Note: Stop making non-canon (not from the cartoons) additions to the 20X6 pages.--Hysterical Woman 13:38, 11 Dec 2004 (MST)

What the crap? Why has this been moved to Stinkoman 20X6? His name is Stinkoman! Aurora the Homestar Coder 03:46, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I agree. This should be moved back to Stinkoman. — Kilroy / talk 03:48, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

The only reason I didn't do it myself was because I'd like to hear Firebird's reason. Aurora the Homestar Coder 03:51, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

"Stinkoman" is the character. "Stinkoman 20X6" is the game. Nothing needs a disambig here. --phlip ^T_C 04:58, 6 Jun 2005 (UTC)

I think someone got the character and the TV show mixed up. But then his name would be "Stinko Man K: 20X6" instead of "Stinkoman 20X6". I think this needs moving back regardless, as his name is always "Stinkoman", or in some cases "Stinko Man". --ENUSY , 07:25, 6 June 2005 (BST)

I've always considered his name Stinkoman 20X6, but apparently I'm wrong. I'll go ahead and move it and delete the disambig page. —FireBird|Talk 02:11, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

Okay. Moved back. —FireBird|Talk 02:27, 8 Jun 2005 (UTC)

When is his name Stinko Man? - C.Olimar788

On the TV show logo, and the Store page for the Stinkoman 20X6 shirt. I think that's all of them. --ENUSY , 04:15, 11 August 2005 (BST)

His legs are at a different angle in the second one. --62.254.32.17 14:27, 13 Sep 2005 (UTC)

Yeah! Take that, Joshua!>:) ...I think. Wait, what? -FaceCrap

What are you talking about? You take pride in saying I'm incorrect? As if you pwned me or something? - Joshua

Sorry, I had said that way back when I didn't like you very much after you had reverted my talk page. Recall... or maybe don't. I looked at it and it's kind of scary. Oh, and he's just in a slightly different position, and his legs aren't always spread. -FaceCrap 14:52, 27 December 2005 (UTC)

Messy Talk Page

So, are we ever gonna divide this part into sections, or are we just gonna have it messy like this? -FaceCrap 13:37, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

What do you mean by "messy"? Looks fine to me. - Joshua 13:41, 29 December 2005 (UTC)

I mean I can't tell where each discussion starts and ends, and I think we should make them == Sections ==. -FaceCrap 13:51, 31 December 2005 (UTC)

There we go for starters. -FaceCrap 15:56, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

I've put <!-- comments --> in where I think titles should be.

This is not an evolution.

His legs are lighter. That's not an evolution, that's a minor improvement in his shading. I think it should be deleted. Who agrees? Poopsmith Z 19:14, 7 Oct 2005 (UTC)

Not me. Rogue Leader / (my talk) 19:15, 7 Oct 2005 (UTC)

I don't agree with you, Poopsmith Z. It is an evolution, albeit a small one, but it is interesting for some to point out. (I didn't notice it until it was added here, and I was wondering if any of the 20X6 characters evolved.) - Joshua 19:26, 7 Oct 2005 (UTC)

In that case, this might be interesting. -FaceCrap 15:00, 27 December 2005 (UTC)